A panel of the six commissioners at the International Trace Commission Monday tossed out a Motorola claim that Apple’s iPhone 4 was in patent violation, foiling its attempt to get the widget banned in America. Motorola and its parent Google can appeal to the Federal Circuit and Google said it was evaluating its options. Apple was absolved of infringing the fourth of four remaining Motorola patents in the suit, which the ITC ultimately found invalid for want of novelty and obviousness. It was about sensors and programming touch screens so a user’s head doesn’t interfere while talking on the phone. Motorola started with six patents covering IP stuff like signal noise.
A panel of the six commissioners at the International Trace Commission Monday tossed out a Motorola claim that Apple’s iPhone 4 was in patent violation, foiling its attempt to get the widget banned in America. Motorola and its parent Google can appeal to the Federal Circuit and Google said it was evaluating its options. Apple was absolved of infringing the fourth of four remaining Motorola patents in the suit, which the ITC ultimately found invalid for want of novelty and obviousness. It was about sensors and programming touch screens so a user’s head doesn’t interfere while talking on the phone. Motorola started with six patents covering IP stuff like signal noise.
In the most anticipated quarterly report in recent memory, Apple – which a few brief months ago was the largest company in the world before its record stock price collapsed – indicated Tuesday that its growth has tempered and its margins have been crimped. It made $9.5 billion, or $10.09 a share, down 18%, on revenues up 11% to $43.6 billion in the March quarter, against earnings of $11.6 billion, or $12.30 a share, on $39.2 billion in revenue a year ago. It was the company’s first earnings decline and first revenue slowdown in years although it beat Wall Street’s lowered revenue estimates of around $42.3 billion. It also forecast flat revenues of only $33.5 billion to $35.5 billion this quarter against Wall Street expectations of $38.2 billion, which could mean its first year-over-year decline in a very long time.
The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), Department of Commerce, intents to sponsor a Federally Funded Research and Development Center (FFRDC) to facilitate public-private collaboration for accelerating the widespread adoption of integrated cybersecurity tools and technologies. This is the first of three notices which must be published over a 90-day period in order to advise the public of the agency's intention to sponsor an FFRDC. DATES: Written comments must be received by 5:00 p.m. Eastern time on July 22, 2013.
In the most anticipated quarterly report in recent memory, Apple – which a few brief months ago was the largest company in the world before its record stock price collapsed – indicated Tuesday that its growth has tempered and its margins have been crimped. It made $9.5 billion, or $10.09 a share, down 18%, on revenues up 11% to $43.6 billion in the March quarter, against earnings of $11.6 billion, or $12.30 a share, on $39.2 billion in revenue a year ago. It was the company’s first earnings decline and first revenue slowdown in years although it beat Wall Street’s lowered revenue estimates of around $42.3 billion. It also forecast flat revenues of only $33.5 billion to $35.5 billion this quarter against Wall Street expectations of $38.2 billion, which could mean its first year-over-year decline in a very long time.
Embarcadero Technologies claims to have created the first real native multi- platform IDE – modeled on its FireMonkey widgetry – that a team can use to build apps that are processor-optimized for PCs, Macs, tablets and smartphones from a single code base on a single schedule to get to market faster without sacrificing performance.
Embarcadero Technologies claims to have created the first real native multi- platform IDE – modeled on its FireMonkey widgetry – that a team can use to build apps that are processor-optimized for PCs, Macs, tablets and smartphones from a single code base on a single schedule to get to market faster without sacrificing performance.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement started to provide its employees up to 17,000 iPhones for work and personal use as the agency moves to replace its Blackberry devices. ICE selected the iPhone after evaluating other types of smartphones such as Android devices and analyzing Blackberry maker Resarch in Motion's business model and innovation rate, GovExec reports. Mobile security company Good Technology is helping ICE roll out the iPhones after previously helping the Department of Homeland Security protect its technology, data and applications from unauthorized people such as hackers. Eugene Liderman, the company's director of public sector technology, told GovExec Good Technology is contracted to secure up to 25,000 mobile users. He said the agency can scale up to 17,000 users with current infrastructure, he said. ICE's phones contain features for wiping a device of government data if it is either misplaced or stolen, but not lose personal files, the report said.
U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement started to provide its employees up to 17,000 iPhones for work and personal use as the agency moves to replace its Blackberry devices. ICE selected the iPhone after evaluating other types of smartphones such as Android devices and analyzing Blackberry maker Resarch in Motion's business model and innovation rate, GovExec reports. Mobile security company Good Technology is helping ICE roll out the iPhones after previously helping the Department of Homeland Security protect its technology, data and applications from unauthorized people such as hackers. Eugene Liderman, the company's director of public sector technology, told GovExec Good Technology is contracted to secure up to 25,000 mobile users. He said the agency can scale up to 17,000 users with current infrastructure, he said. ICE's phones contain features for wiping a device of government data if it is either misplaced or stolen, but not lose personal files, the report said.
Samsung rushed in to tell District Court Judge Lucy Koh the other day that the US Patent and Trademark Office had found a major claim in Apple’s so-called Rubber-banding patent invalid (US Patent No. 7,469,381). The PTO said it wasn’t novel based on prior art. The decision is a so-called Final Office Action, which – in the bureaucratic scheme of things – isn’t really final until Apple exhausts all appeals available, a process likely to take years. Last August a jury found the patent valid and infringed by Samsung. Then a PTO re-examination found it invalid in what they call a First Office Action. The PTO has found three claims in the patent valid and tossed out 17 other claims including the one important in Apple’s infringement case against Samsung, claim 19.
Samsung rushed in to tell District Court Judge Lucy Koh the other day that the US Patent and Trademark Office had found a major claim in Apple’s so-called Rubber-banding patent invalid (US Patent No. 7,469,381). The PTO said it wasn’t novel based on prior art. The decision is a so-called Final Office Action, which – in the bureaucratic scheme of things – isn’t really final until Apple exhausts all appeals available, a process likely to take years. Last August a jury found the patent valid and infringed by Samsung. Then a PTO re-examination found it invalid in what they call a First Office Action. The PTO has found three claims in the patent valid and tossed out 17 other claims including the one important in Apple’s infringement case against Samsung, claim 19.
OpenXava is a framework for Rapid Development of Web Applications for iPad, well-suited for business and database oriented applications. OpenXava allows you develop applications just by writing simple domain classes with Java or Groovy. The user interface is generated automatically in runtime, without code generation. Learn more about iPad support in OpenXava.
OpenXava is a framework for Rapid Development of Web Applications for iPad, well-suited for business and database oriented applications. OpenXava allows you develop applications just by writing simple domain classes with Java or Groovy. The user interface is generated automatically in runtime, without code generation. Learn more about iPad support in OpenXava.
The next two generations of iPhones were designed before Steve Jobs died in October of 2011, according to San Francisco District Attorney George Gascón, who reportedly gleaned this little tidbit during a rambling conversation with Apple’s government liaison, Michael Foulkes. The San Francisco Examiner reports that the D.A. was told the future iPhones “have already been developed” and “preceded Tim Cook.” Gascón was talking to Apple to get its backing for a kill switch that would disable cell phones and tablets when they’re reported stolen. The idea is to make the widgets less attractive to thieves. Devices such as iPhones were involved in half the city’s robberies last year but the D.A. isn’t getting much support for the idea from widget makers or service providers.
The next two generations of iPhones were designed before Steve Jobs died in October of 2011, according to San Francisco District Attorney George Gascón, who reportedly gleaned this little tidbit during a rambling conversation with Apple’s government liaison, Michael Foulkes. The San Francisco Examiner reports that the D.A. was told the future iPhones “have already been developed” and “preceded Tim Cook.” Gascón was talking to Apple to get its backing for a kill switch that would disable cell phones and tablets when they’re reported stolen. The idea is to make the widgets less attractive to thieves. Devices such as iPhones were involved in half the city’s robberies last year but the D.A. isn’t getting much support for the idea from widget makers or service providers.
After Judge Lucy Koh cut $450.5 million off the original stunning $1.05 billion in damages a jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple for infringing its patents, Apple checked the judge’s arithmetic and wants to file a conditional motion to reconsider. It complains it’s been gypped of $85 million and that two Samsung phones were on the market during the time required for Samsung to disgorge its profits. Apple says it’s really entitled to damages of at least $685 million. FOSS Patents says Apple is only bringing the issue up now to pre-empt the partial final judgment requested by Samsung. Aside from the appeals that have been lodged by both Apple and Samsung, Koh has ordered a new trial to recalculate the damages and that means the total damages could ultimately go up or down.
A coalition of news organizations and media advocacy groups including Bloomberg, The New York Times and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has asked the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold District Court Judge Lucy Koh’s order that Apple and Samsung unseal financial documents filed in Apple’s patent infringement litigation against the Korean giant. Reuters says such a decision “would set an important precedent for high-level intellectual property cases” where sealing documents to keep them from the press is a knee-jerk reaction.
A coalition of news organizations and media advocacy groups including Bloomberg, The New York Times and the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press has asked the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals to uphold District Court Judge Lucy Koh’s order that Apple and Samsung unseal financial documents filed in Apple’s patent infringement litigation against the Korean giant. Reuters says such a decision “would set an important precedent for high-level intellectual property cases” where sealing documents to keep them from the press is a knee-jerk reaction.
After Judge Lucy Koh cut $450.5 million off the original stunning $1.05 billion in damages a jury ordered Samsung to pay Apple for infringing its patents, Apple checked the judge’s arithmetic and wants to file a conditional motion to reconsider. It complains it’s been gypped of $85 million and that two Samsung phones were on the market during the time required for Samsung to disgorge its profits. Apple says it’s really entitled to damages of at least $685 million. FOSS Patents says Apple is only bringing the issue up now to pre-empt the partial final judgment requested by Samsung. Aside from the appeals that have been lodged by both Apple and Samsung, Koh has ordered a new trial to recalculate the damages and that means the total damages could ultimately go up or down.
This book is what it claims to be and that is a cookbook on advanced topics. I would follow the author's advice and if you are a beginner with Objective-C or iOS, this book is not the one you want to start with. This book is however an excellent book for experienced developers. The first chapter kicks right into overdrive with a really nice overview of device specific development. It shows you how to get device capabilities and how to take advantage of that information in your applications. It continues on with 12 more excellent chapters which I have listed below.
This book is what it claims to be and that is a cookbook on advanced topics. I would follow the author's advice and if you are a beginner with Objective-C or iOS, this book is not the one you want to start with. This book is however an excellent book for experienced developers. The first chapter kicks right into overdrive with a really nice overview of device specific development. It shows you how to get device capabilities and how to take advantage of that information in your applications. It continues on with 12 more excellent chapters which I have listed below.
Apple has gotten sued for patent infringement again, but this time the charges are coming from Intertrust Technologies Corporation, now owned jointly by Sony and Royal Philips Electronics NV, which got Microsoft to settle a broad claim back in 2004 for $440 million. The suit against Apple sounds a lot more expensive. It says Apple is in violation of 15 of its fundamental patents naming the iPhone, iPad, Macs, Apple TV, iTunes, iCloud and the App Store as the offenders. Intertrust has taken its 44-page complaint to the federal court for Northern California after talks with Apple going back to ’05 failed. Its software called Marlin, is used to protect digital content, and companies like Samsung, Nokia, HTC and Huawei either license it or the IP underneath.
Apple has gotten sued for patent infringement again, but this time the charges are coming from Intertrust Technologies Corporation, now owned jointly by Sony and Royal Philips Electronics NV, which got Microsoft to settle a broad claim back in 2004 for $440 million. The suit against Apple sounds a lot more expensive. It says Apple is in violation of 15 of its fundamental patents naming the iPhone, iPad, Macs, Apple TV, iTunes, iCloud and the App Store as the offenders. Intertrust has taken its 44-page complaint to the federal court for Northern California after talks with Apple going back to ’05 failed. Its software called Marlin, is used to protect digital content, and companies like Samsung, Nokia, HTC and Huawei either license it or the IP underneath.
Apple polished its reputation as a contrarian Tuesday when the news broke because of an SEC filing that it had hired Adobe’s CTO Kevin Lynch to be VP of technology and reportedly coordinate its hardware and software teams. Adobe confirmed his departure effective Friday, March 22. He will report to SVP Bob Mansfield, Apple’s core hardware maven, who leads Apple’s Technologies Group, which includes its wireless and semiconductor interests. Provocatively Mansfield is scheduled to retire from Apple for the second time next year. Lynch, a Macromedia legacy, violently backed Mobile Flash to the hilt as a sine qua non platform long after Steve Jobs famously blasted the widgetry’s reliability, security, performance and battery life problems, chalking it up as bad, inelegant software and barring it from the iPhone and the iPad. The news of Lynch going to Apple lit up the blogosphere but left the question of why Apple hired him unanswered.
Apple polished its reputation as a contrarian Tuesday when the news broke because of an SEC filing that it had hired Adobe’s CTO Kevin Lynch to be VP of technology and reportedly coordinate its hardware and software teams. Adobe confirmed his departure effective Friday, March 22. He will report to SVP Bob Mansfield, Apple’s core hardware maven, who leads Apple’s Technologies Group, which includes its wireless and semiconductor interests. Provocatively Mansfield is scheduled to retire from Apple for the second time next year. Lynch, a Macromedia legacy, violently backed Mobile Flash to the hilt as a sine qua non platform long after Steve Jobs famously blasted the widgetry’s reliability, security, performance and battery life problems, chalking it up as bad, inelegant software and barring it from the iPhone and the iPad. The news of Lynch going to Apple lit up the blogosphere but left the question of why Apple hired him unanswered.