Log on:
Powered by Elgg

Feed detail

January 27, 2012

Border crossings

As ever, the Learning without Frontiers conference and festival was a rallying point for those who are at the forefront of innovation in education. All sectors were represented, and with the Learning and Development professionals conference in tandem on the floor above, the joint event showed real attempts to embrace all education and training practices. A few of the invited speakers were shared across both events, giving presentations to two separate audiences in two different venues within the Olympia complex. Hosting the two major events in tandem for the first time was an experiment that was simultaneously exhilarating and frustrating. It was exhilarating because so many members of the extended UK learning community were together in one place for the first time, but frustrating because those of us who habituate both events were well and truly torn between what to attend. Both events are enjoyable and memorable, not least because of the enthusiasm, passion and openness of the people who attend.

Upstairs in the Learning Technologies event, over 500 delegates listened to presentations from the likes of Edward de Bono, Donald Clark, Joanne Jacobs, Nigel Paine, and myself as well as shared speakers Stephen Heppell, Jaron Lanier and Ray Kurzweil. Generally the same message was dominant in both events, namely that learning is undergoing a makeover, but that it needs to go more than skin deep. Indeed there were signs that things are changing, slowly but surely. I noticed a concerted effort this year for example, that 'downstairs' in the main conference exhibition area, efforts were being made to percolate some of the innovative practices talked about 'upstairs' into the free public vendor area. The LT Exchange stand hosted a number of live interviews with a variety of presenters amidst a relaxed environment, complete with a catering facility. Questions of the hour were pinned to the wall for open discussion with the presenters. This at least brought the cut and thrust of the live presentations downstairs for greater exposure and wider discussion outside the main conference. Videos of the keynotes were played out regularly to the downstairs delegates too, giving them a flavour of the proceedings in the main conference auditorium. Such features at least partially addressed the conceptual divide I wrote about in Upstairs Downstairs about last year's event.


Both events featured presentations with flare, but in my opinion it was within the Learning without Frontiers event that innovation was at its most evident. As ever, the LWF team were trying to push boundaries with a programme of quick fire main hall presentations and a fast moving programme of peripheral events. In yesterday's post I featured the iconic inflatable dome village, which was a tangible counterpoint to the more staid, traditional conference exhibition just across the landing.

The event focused on learning 'without frontiers', but conferences impose barriers by their very nature. The sentinels at the gate dividing the two exhibitions represented the organisational border point, and one passport (either conference badge would do) was scanned repeatedly as people passed from one 'country' into another. I was left wondering why the border crossing was necessary. Was it there to separate the two tribes - corporate and public sector? It created a log jam when several people wished to cross between the two exhibition zones simultaneously, and the bar-code scanners were working overtime.

For me, the border between the two events also signified a metaphorical divide between the conservative and the radical. In just a few paces, one was able to move from a traditional conference stand exhibiting corporate training packages and organisational planning tools to inflatable domes with interactive robotic displays or Lego building playzones. It reminded me of a backwards in time journey from the world of work and business to school. Significantly, good learning is required in both those spheres of activity, and the methods employs to deliver these opportunities can be vastly different. That was a part of the appeal of the marriage between the two events. The question running through my mind throughout the entire joint event though, was whether there will be a movement of business and industry learning and development towards the game based, interactive and exciting methods beginning to emerge in the compulsory education sector. And how far will public sector education be able to move in new directions without the funding available to most private sector initiatives?

We were reminded once more that the schools sector is itself far from perfect. Speakers such as Stephen 'remove your shoes' Heppell and Francis Gilbert eloquently challenged the tired old school formula with clarion calls for better learner engagement, student centred approaches and innovative technology applications in radical new learning environments. Others spoke repeatedly about the 'purpose of education', putting excitement back in to learning, and breaking the old paradigms. Ellen MacArthur inspired us all as she related her personal journey. Ray Kurzweil blinded us with computer science, whilst Michael Brooks urged us to be mavericks and to push the boundaries of possibilities to make the change. It was all heady stuff, but how much of the idealism and fervour of this event can and will be taken back and actually allowed to be embedded in everyday practice? We shall see, but I suspect that as always, it will be the lone rangers who forge ahead with their leading edge practices, and it will be a long time before most institutions change their ways. But it was another restart, a boost to our collective esteem, a charging of the batteries .... and we can all hope that it won't be long before the border crossing disappears.


Creative Commons Licence
Border crossings by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 26, 2012

Welcome to the pleasure domes

The dome village created by Graham Brown-Martin and his Learning without Frontiers team - at Olympia in London this week - seems to have been a great hit for many delegates. Edgy, futuristic and a visual spectacle in all their underlit splendour, the domes hosted debates, panels, presentations, demonstrations and a chance to get hands on lego, Nintendo games, retro computers, robots and a whole host of other interesting goodies. The two salons, 'Foucault' and 'Bourdieu' (after the famous French comedy mime duo) hosted a rolling programme of presentations throughout the two days of the conference/festival, and at times seemed to be bursting at the seams. (OK, I'm joking about Foucault and Bourdieu - I know they weren't a duo). Whether the move from the East End to Olynpia is a success will be debated for some time to come, but just about everyone I spoke to agreed that the conceptualisation of the domes was inspired. For me, the National History of Computing Museum dome was a draw, with its display of working BBC B, Master and Archimedes computers, complete with their external floppy disk drives and chunky Microvitec monitors. I was struck with a sense of nostalgia (and duly took two paracetamol) because computers of their ilk were the ones I cut my programmer's teeth on all those years ago in the early 1980s. The entire space for LWF12 was utilised in a creative way, with the main auditorium hedged on three sides by the dome village.

The invited speaker line-up was stellar, including video presentations from Noam Chomsky and Sir Ken Robinson, and live presentations for the likes of Mitch Resnick, Jaron Lanier, Conrad Wolfram, Ellen McArthur, Charles Leadbeater, Keri Facer, Stephen Heppell and Ray Kurzweil. Politicians from both sides of the house (specifically Lord Jim Knight and Culture secretary Ed Vaisey) also put in an appearance on the main stage - but sadly not together. Unfortunately, the close proximity of the arena stage to the open balcony made for a lot of noise problems, as just below was one of the largest learning technology exhibitions since BETT. The constant background drone of conversations rising from below was a little distracting, as was the sharp odour emitting from the freshly painted false walls of the arena, but most people seemed to successfully tune their senses out to concentrate on the presentations.

But it was around and inside the domes that much of the conversations, connections and creativity took place. The domes were a stark contrast to the adjacent conventional exhibition and speaker spaces in the Learning Technologies and Skills Conference, which ran concurrently on both days, a couple of floors above. I will discuss the issues surrounding the juxtapositioning of two of Europe's largest learning conferences in a future post, but for now, it is worth saying that the co-presence of the two events under a single roof brought benefits and limitations in equal measure. The domes were a triumph, the LWF programme was inspirational and GBM and his team have once again has delivered a superbly crafted, memorable, and inspirational event and a clear reference point for revolutionary and disruptive learning futures.

I will write more reports on Learning without Frontiers and also Learning Technologies in future blog posts.


Creative Commons Licence
Welcome to the pleasure domes by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 23, 2012

Dead philosopher society

Remember the Dead Poets Society? It was a movie starring Robin Williams as a maverick teacher who causes ructions at an ultra-conservative American prep school when he uses his unauthodox methods to engage and inspire his students. It was a heart warming movie, and if you could get past Williams' emetic impersonations, it had a strong message for educators everywhere: dare to take a few risks. The fact that one of William's young charges commits suicide in the film is a bit of a dampener, but there is some interesting underlying philosophy in the screen play. Hmmm... philosophy...

Are you interested in philosophy and have a Twitter account? If the answer to those questions is 'yes', it so happens that Twitter has its own Dead Philosophers Society. Yes, there are famous philosophers on Twitter - alive and tweeting. The accounts are all fake, obviously, but if you want a daily dose of philosophy to make you think, ponder life or something to quote to irritate your friends, colleagues or family, your favourite sage is probably out there somewhere, just waiting for you to follow them. Many of the accounts simply tweet unadulterated quotes from published works or well trodden aphorisms from their late authors, but one or two may engage in dialogue with their followers. Here are a few of Twitter's philosopher accounts I have stumbled across (and occasionally retweeted) in the past few days. Explore for yourself ... and follow whom you will:

Mikhail Bakhtin
Roland Barthes
Pierre Bourdieu (in French)
Gilles Deleuze
Jacques Derrida
Paulo Freire
Ivan Illich
Jacques Lacan
Friedrich Nietzsche
Claude Levi-Strauss
Susan Sontag
Ludwig Wittgenstein

If you know of any other dead philosophers who are still alive and tweeting, and want to recommend them, please add their links in the comments box below.

Image source


Creative Commons Licence
Dead philosopher society by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 21, 2012

Me or the community?

I started off a discussion this morning on Twitter which had been fermenting for several days since I spoke at Brighton University earlier this week. We were discussing the differences and similarities between Facebook and Twitter. Specifically, we were interested in discussing what each was best for, and whether people found one better than the other for teaching, learning, discussion or socialising. I was wondering whether Twitter was actually more community oriented and outward looking than Facebook, which to me often seems to be more closed down and inward looking. To start, I asked: Facebook is all about 'me'. Twitter is all about community. Discuss.

Will Dayamport made a profound statement right at the start of the discussion when he tweeted: no social platform is a community. they are only vehicles for building a community. This is of course true, in the sense that platforms are tools that facilitate, but are they as neutral as we think? What about affordances of each tool? What do they suggest to us and how do we respond? Next, Frances Bell suggested that all social media have channels and services that host multiple behaviours, so simple dichotomies don't work. While these contributions were helpful, they reach the core of what I was interested in. I was trying to get to the root of the issue, which is whether people see Facebook as a more closed down and private space than Twitter, which I consider to be much more open. Jeffrey Keefer made another valuable comment when he pointed out that although social media platforms facilitate and support, they don't do the work for us. Social media are great tools for building online communities, but how do we use them, and is one tool better than another for a particular purpose?

Because Twitter is open, and you are not required to be 'friends' or have membership of a group to interact with others, I was really asking whether Twitter has the capacity to be more open and community oriented than Facebook. To me, Facebook seems very closed and compartmentalised, and is therefore potentially useful for protected discussions (for example where young people or vulnerable groups need to chat in a walled garden environment) but Twitter opens up chat for all, regardless of their status or relationship with others. Yes, I know that Facebook can be used as an open forum too, as can most social media platforms, but our expectations may militate against this. Is Twitter therefore the best social media tool for open, democratic discourse? Others contributed to this discussion, especially around the notion of digital identity, including Anita Devi who asked whether the 'me' can really exist in a Facebook vacuum. Anne Olsen argued that Twitter is more focused on learning and sharing with a likeminded community. In Facebook, she said, 'friends' don't always share the same interests, so it is more likely to be about 'me' than it is the community. Susan Bannister saw little difference between the two platforms in her own use, revealing that for her (and probably for many other users) although Facebook used to be about family and friends, and Twitter was more focused on work, now the boundaries have become blurred. Nic Laycock agreed, pointing out how complex relationships have become since the inception of social media. Others have managed to maintain their boundaries between the two platforms. Linda Kirkman for example, finds Facebook good to keep in touch with people she knows in real life, and used Twitter mainly for ongoing professional development and support for her post-graduate studies.

What do other people use the tools for? One of my own students Hannah Shelton said that for her Twitter is for sharing thoughts that interest others and help them to build their PLN, whilst Facebook is still about socialising. Malcolm Clarke sees Twitter as an open place of catharsis - somewhere to go where 'you can get it off your chest', whilst Lenandlar Singh suspects that we have come to expect Facebook to be a more private, closed environment. Another of my students, Megan Douglas made an interesting distinction based on what people see the two platforms doing for them personally. She tweeted: Facebook is personal 'what's on your mind?' yet Twitter 'what's happening?' and argued that Twitter brings people with similar interests together. This is after all, what a community is about. People who have shared interests, common purposes and the ability to share their ideas in conversation become the community. I'm still convinced that Facebook is more inward looking, and is more about personal connections, while Twitter is more focused on community, and wider connections, sharing and learning. My colleague Peter Yeomans has some marked views about Twitter and Facebook. Twitter he says, is a bear pit - a speaker's corner where you talk to the world and hope someone listens, whilst Facebook is where you seek approbation from those who like you. Facebook is self-indulgent, he says, but Twitter is altruistic. What do you think?

This is an interesting, wide ranging discussion I hope will continue. Please join in by adding your comments below if you have any.

Image source


Creative Commons Licence
Me or the community? by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 20, 2012

Thinking on your feet

A woman takes her pet chihuahua with her to Africa on a safari holiday. One day the chihuahua wanders away and gets lost in the bush, and nearly runs right into a huge, hungry looking lion. The chihuahua realises he's in trouble, but, noticing some fresh bones on the ground, he settles down to chew on them, with his back to the big cat. As the lion sneaks up behind, the chihuahua smacks his lips and exclaims loudly, "Wow, that was a delicious lion. I wonder if there are any more around here?" The lion stops mid-stride, and slinks away into the trees. "Phew," says the lion, "that was close - that evil little dog nearly had me."

A monkey nearby sees everything and thinks he'll win a favour by putting the stupid lion straight. The chihuahua sees the monkey go after the lion, and guesses he might be up to no good. When the lion hears the monkey's story he feels angry at being made a fool, and offers the monkey a ride back to see him exact his revenge. The little dog sees them approaching and fears the worst. Thinking quickly, the dog turns his back, pretends not to notice them, and when the pair are within earshot says aloud, "Now where did that monkey get to? I sent him out ages ago to bring me another lion..."

Thinking on your feet means being able to solve problems as they arise. It is one of the key skills of the 21st century, and it's based on previous experiences, the ability to handle unpredictable events and creative thinking. It is the ability to recognise changing conditions and respond appropriately to them. It is the ability to recognise an opportunity and exploit it to your advantage when the time is right. It is also the very reason that Kodak, one of the giants in the photographic industry of the last century, is now in financial difficulty. The company, a pioneer in photography, used to own an unassailable share of the world market, but Kodak failed to adapt to the digital age as quickly as its competitors, and it is now paying the price. It didn't move with the times, and its leadership team didn't learn to think on their feet. Being able to adapt quickly to changing conditions is the stuff entrepreneurs are made of, and this is how young people need to be equipped when they emerge into the world of work. But how can schools, colleges and universities help students to learn these skills?

The recent Head Teacher Update (January 2012), features an article written by Graham Brown-Martin entitled 'What the future holds'. In it, he outlines some of the current limitations of school and critiques the failure of schools to respond quickly enough to the rapid changes currently taking place in society. He demonstrates how video games are the defining art of the 21st Century, but we clearly have to temper this view with the fact that we are only in the second decade of the Century, and with the rapid changes taking place, we can expect other art forms to emerge and even dominate in short periods. For the time being however, Graham is right - the video games industry is now grossing more worldwide than the publishing, music and movies industries combined, and is a defining feature not only of youth culture, but all western culture, because games are incredibly engaging. Graham makes a memorable statement when he declares that when we play games we rapidly solve abstract problems in real time. He points out that game playing often involves continual assessment by peers, and many games rely on teamwork and collaboration. These skills, he argues, are exactly the skills young people require in today's ever shifting world of work. Stanford University professor Elizabeth Corcoran takes a different stance, suggesting that gamification (the art of using games to engage and inspire learning... 'is creating an expectation among people that real-life interactions follow simple mechanics, and some disillusionment when they do not'.

Yet despite such objections, games based learning in all its guises is one of the most powerful methods currently available to engage young people in learning, and facilitate the learning of transferable skills that they will need to help them to think on their feet.


Creative Commons Licence
Thinking on your feet by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 17, 2012

10Q: Cathy N. Davidson

Cathy N. Davidson first flashed on to my radar last year when the Times Higher Education news magazine invited me to review her new book Now You See It. When I read the summary, I remembered that Cathy had been the prime mover in one of the first large scale iPod education projects at Duke University several years before. Then it all clicked. I have to say I enjoyed her book immensely and learnt a lot from reading it. I got paid to do the review and it felt a little like theft, because I would have gladly have paid to read the book for myself. You can read my review here, and I'm delighted to say that since it was published, I have been in touch with Cathy and have enjoyed some interesting conversations with her. She is truly one of the world's visionaries when it comes to rethinking learning, and as one would expect, she is controversial too. Her books, and other projects she has engaged with over the years have all received brickbats as well as bouquets. But that is the nature of innovation. It disrupts, and it discomforts. In today's article, Cathy responds to my 10Q interview questions:

Who are you? I am a lifelong innovator and a lifelong college professor - and if you think those two things are contradictory, you may be right! I've spent my life doing unconventional work, both in the academy and in communities and the workplace, pushing for educational reform. I'm lucky that my home institution, Duke University, has rewarded me for being an iconoclast. For eight years (1998-2006) I was essentially the R and D person for the university, Duke's first full-time Vice Provost for Interdisciplinary Studies (the first anywhere in the US in fact), charged with innovation across all eight schools of the university, and with the delicious mandate to "break things and make things." We made national news with our iPod experiment where we gave students iPods the year they came out and challenged them to come up with educational uses. Steve Jobs was no fool and he got a lot of free R and D out of Duke, where we held the first ever academic "podcasting" (the quotation marks were on the poster) conference. More than that, we created a paradigm shift, since students, not faculty, led the innovation. That's the byword of the kind of educator I strive to be, committed to learning (Kindergarten through the retirement home) that's motivated, engaged, inspired and inspiring.

What and/or who inspires you? So many things inspire me but if I could name one it would be the Open Web. The World Wide Web is not a technology--it is a mode of interaction and communication that potentially empowers any of us to contribute to one another's knowledge and well-being. It is the potential for participation, worldwide, with consequences that are real and palpable, that inspires me. It's not just Wikipedia (although that's inspiring enough) but the whole world of Do-It-Yourself possibilities that are really "Do-It-Together." Of course there are down sides, too, but you asked what "inspires" me, and that's it, the potential of collective change and participation. I like to remind people of historian Robert Darnton's idea that there have really been only four "technologies" in human history that have changed the very terms of how we communicate as a species: writing (4000 BCE Mesopotamia), movable type (10th C China and 15th C Europe with Gutenberg), steam-powered presses/mass printing (late 18th C), and the Internet (commercially available since April 1993 with the release of the Mosaic 1.0 browser). We need to take that in. We are now seeing the first generation to come of age during humanity's fourth great information age. That is inspiring.

Why did you choose to be an educator? Well, it's the last thing anyone would have predicted. I was one of those students who excelled in certain things (mostly certain areas of math and writing), and was pretty abysmal in everything else. I was also in trouble. A lot. At his recent 85th birthday party, my father did a pretty funny stand-up act rehashing all the times I'd been kicked out of school, from kindergarten (really!) to middle school and then four times in high school. It was a set-up because he'd organized the family to create a little plaque for me, honoring my confirmation by the Senate after being nominated by President Obama to serve on the National Council on the Humanities. ("Our favorite family delinquent" or some such thing). Okay, so there is your answer: I've spent my entire life fighting the standard educational system and just turned that into a profession in the end, one that I've been very fortunate to flourish in. Interestingly, I'm often at gatherings of educational innovators where it turns out we were all in trouble more than once as students--and, as adults, still tend to think we were right.

What did you learn from your iPod experiment at Duke University? It was a bit devious, that was its real charm. We only gave the shiny new Duke-branded iPods "free" to first year students. The second, third, and fourth year students were furious at us. Of course we knew they would be. So we challenged them. We said if they came up with new learning uses for what was in 2003 a "music-listening device," and if they could convince a prof to change a syllabus to include this new learning application in the course, then we would give a free iPod to the professor and every student in that class. Within one semester, we gave away more iPods to students who had come up with these learning applications than we had, without strings, to the first years. That's success! We didn't just come up with R and D for the late Mr. Jobs but we changed the terms of the conversation, acknowledging that the new generation had new technical skills but that their professors had much to offer in thinking not just about technology but about use, IP, safety, security, and on and on. We flipped the learning rules in an important way.

Sadly, we've heard from Apple that the experiment convinced them not to lead their marketing with the idea that a new release of a product was for formal education. They saw that we were creamed in the press and in the other media for this experiment when we announced it - and then there was silence when it was a big success. One Apple executive recently said to me, "You may notice we now talk about life, home, and inspiration - not education in our ads. That was a billion dollar insight, how unfairly Duke was treated, how afraid people, including the media, are of educational innovation." Now, I've heard the next Apple release will be taking on formal education. If that is true, I’d like to think we were the front-runners of that change. Maybe society is finally ready, almost a decade later.

What does brain science contribute to our understanding of how we learn? The pundits are pushing the myth of mono-tasking, and the idea that somehow this era's Internet and mobile technologies violate the otherwise straight, narrow, linear, focused ways we operate in the world. They argue that multitasking is making us inefficient, distracted, shallow, lonely, incapable of reading long or deep works, unable to memorize anything any more. That’s just bad neuroscience, not supported by research that isn't front-loaded to support those conclusions. You look at the research design of 95% of the monotasking research and it is fraught, loaded, unhistorical, selective, and just plain prejudiced. Blaming technology for human distraction isn't anything new. Socrates, after all, said similar things about the invention of the writing (the Greek alphabet and the diacritical mark), and it was all downhill from there.

On the other hand, we have hundreds, even thousands of years, of Eastern traditions devoted to attention and mindfulness. In those traditions, meditation takes place in a quiet room, supposedly isolated from all distracting influence. Instead of mindfulness, the world intrudes. That is what lifelong Buddhist practice is about, and neuroscience supports the Eastern idea that the mind is intrinsically (not extrinsically) susceptible to distraction. The work of Morcom and Fletcher at Cambridge and Raichle at Washington University suggest that 80% of the brain's energy is spent talking to itself, that there is no "baseline" of attention from which the world distracts us.

On the positive side, we know is that the brain learns by unlearning: when we are disrupted, when we make a mistake, we build on that. Habits are efficient, but they also get us into a lot of trouble since we can no longer see what is habitual. I believe in calculated, creative disruption as the single most important ingredient in learning. That’s how you write code, of course. You don’t memorize. You work on it until it works and, when it doesn’t, you figure out what does work.

You had a lot of criticism and praise about your recent book Now You See It. What's the fuss about? I would have been disappointed if no one was angry about the book because it would have meant I wasn’t pushing hard enough for change. (Yes, there’s a pattern here!) One point of the title “Now You See It” is about the phenomenon of attention blindness (in the jargon, “inattentional blindness”) that I discuss as neurobiology and as metaphor: the more you focus in one direction, the more you miss everywhere else. I advocate Learning 3.0, what I call “collaboration by difference,” where we learn best not from experts but by those who offer radically different points of view, including opposite forms of expertise (training, culture, age, experiences, all of the above).

The other point of Now You See It as a title is it strives for a major paradigm shift. If Frederick Winslow Taylor stamped the whole 20th century with “scientific labor management” that, I argue, was turned by the educational-industrial complex into “scientific learning management” that trained an Industrial Age way of learning and working, I wrote Now You See It for a similar transformation in the ways we measure, collaborate, learn, work, and, indeed, live. If you are aiming that high - for a reversal of a century’s worth of deciding what counts, what is valued, how you count, and who decides what counts - not everyone will love you. That said, I am so fortunate: I have given 41 invited lectures since September 7, all of them by institutions that are seeking to transform their methods for “humanity’s fourth great information age.” I can’t begin to accept all the invitations I receive. It is so gratifying and, yes, inspiring to know that many institutions are already moving in this direction. It’s not just me but a worldwide movement towards rethinking education for the 21st century. I see that in the HASTAC Scholars, the graduate and undergraduate students who are part of the nonprofit I co-founded, HASTAC, that is dedicated, as we say, to “learning the future together.”

You asked earlier what inspires me. This is what inspires me: all these millions of people around the world whose lives have changed since April 1993 and who now want to change the institutions of work and learning for this new way we all communicate and interact.

What interesting projects or research are you currently working on? Now You See It is a big book with an even bigger vision of how we need to transform not just education but also the workplace and the way we view our lives, from infancy to old age. I now want to do a series of small, focused Now You Do It books that are more activist in nature, that have url’s to lots of ordinary people who “see it” and are doing remarkable things to make a new interconnected vision happen. So I’ve been talking to a graphic novelist about a comics version, maybe even a YA version, intended for students, college and high school. I’m also interested in a book specifically for K-12 teachers and for parents explaining and giving possible, diverse blueprints for my idea that the “3 R’s” (reading, ‘riting, ‘rithmetic) were right for the 19th century schoolroom that was training people for the industrial workplace - but now we need to add a fourth R (pRogramming or algorithm ...you choose the ‘R’ word!). I’m convinced that if five year olds learned programming along with fundamental digital literacies, responsibilities, and possibilities that they would fight to keep the Web open. They would see themselves as contributors, not just consumers. And the Industrial Age division of the “two cultures” (with human and social sciences and the arts on one side of the equation and science and technology on the other) would be shown to be as nonsensical as, in everyday life, it is. The Web is a technology of life. But if we let others program it, if we aren’t participating and contributing, then we are being technologized. As Douglas Rushkoff says, “program or be programmed.”

Finally, it really bothers me that so many open Web tech gatherings I attend are almost entirely white, middle-class guys. You can’t have a truly diverse, open technology created by a homogenous group of creators. If everyone learned programming, you’d be learning a think-as-you-do method, a social method, a technology that was also about multimedia representation (the arts), and that would have profound social implications for a diverse future, with developers thinking of ways to reach an audience that was more diverse in every way.

If you could go back in time and do one thing differently, what would you change? I actually don’t like the idea of going “back in time and doing differently.” I want to go forward in time and do it differently! This year, for example, I’m learning how to draw again. I thought at one point in life that I wanted to be an artist but hadn’t drawn anything since college art classes. I love it. I’ve also taken an online writing course to see how those actually work. And want to take a TechCrunch coding course online since I definitely need a refresher course.

What changes in education would you like to see? Get rid of the tyranny of standardized testing. It was invented in 1914, to be as fast and efficient as the assembly line that turned out Model Ts, to deal with a teacher shortage in World War I. It never was meant to be for more than, to quote Frederick Kelly who created the test, to test “lower order thinking” for the masses. It’s the tail wagging the learning dog. Thank goodness for Finland and for a totally different model of thinking about learning that, ironically, turns out to test #1 in the world according to the OECD, even though their Dewey-esque learn-then-do system, with its emphasis on equality not excellence, bans standardized testing in classrooms. I see Pasi Sahlberg as a fellow traveler and recommend his Finnish Lessons: What Can the World Learn from Educational Change in Finland?

What's the most important advice you can give to educators? Focus on inspiring learning, not on test scores. Listen to your students. Don’t worry about expensive technology—worry about thinking about the way kids live and work today and how students, at any age, can be prepared for a world where, according to one study, 65% of 15-year-olds will end up in careers not invented yet, and will change careers (not jobs but careers) 4-6 times in the course of their lives. Teach for disruption. And teach disruptively. That’s the key.

Image courtesy of Cathy N. Davidson


Creative Commons Licence
10Q: Cathy Davidson by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 16, 2012

The Pelecon flies again

We have enjoyed 6 successful e-learning conferences in Plymouth over the past decade. In recent years, the Plymouth e-Learning Conference (or PeLC) has grown from a small local one day teacher conference, into a large, international 3 day event which showcases the very best and latest in digital pedagogies. Over the years, we have welcomed a galaxy of world class keynote speakers, such as Stephen Molyneaux, Gilly Salmon, Josie Fraser, Stephen Heppell, Sherry Terrell, David White, John Davitt, Graham Attwell, Mike Blamires, Jane Seale and Mark Stiles.

Other who have presented papers and workshops at the event over the years have included James Clay, Miles Berry, Shirley Williams, Pat Parslow, Helen Keegan, Malinka Ivanova, Neil Witt, Carmen Holotescu, Mike Phillips, Doug Dickinson, Craig Taylor, Matt Lingard, Lyndsay Jordan, Bex Lewis, Andy Ramsden, Dan Roberts, Thomas Fischer, Doug Belshaw, Catherine Cronin, Richard Hall, Sharon Flynn, Mark Childs, Fiona Concannon, Thomas Kretschmer and far too many others to list here on this blog. We have also welcomed many student presenters over the years, and showcased our own Plymouth University robotic football team and vision immersion theatre. Most delegates who have attended will tell you that Pelecon is an exciting and inspiring conference at many levels.


The 2012 Plymouth Enhanced Learning Conference (yes we replaced 'electronic' for 'enhanced' last year to reflect the shift in emphasis from tools to pedagogies) is number 7 in the series, and has been rebranded with a new logo and new website. This year's lineup of invited speakers is bigger than ever, as you can see from the picture above. Our four keynotes are Jane Hart, Alec Couros, Keri Facer and Simon Finch, and for the first time this year we also have 3 spotlight speakers in Leigh Graves Wolf, David Mitchell and Helen Keegan. Once again we are planning an evening Teachmeet, Student Voice Showcase and other shows that run parallel with the conference. One of our new ideas is to have a 'Failure Confessional' where we talk about what went wrong, and all learn from our mistakes. We also take over exclusive occupancy of the famous Glassblowing House restaurant on Plymouth's historic Barbican seafront for our social event on the second night of the conference. Many people have said that Pelecon is one of the friendliest conferences of its type, and this year's event will be no exception. With its idyllic setting 'twixt moorland and sea, wonderful weather (we have excellent connections) and the famous Devon cream tea (calorie free), what better place could you spend your time between 18-20 April this year? Full cost for the entire three day event is just £200. We hope to see you at Pelecon this year!

Visit the Pelecon website for further details.

Fishing boat image by Jose Luis Garcia


Creative Commons Licence
The Pelecon flies again by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 15, 2012

We learn by teaching

Although I am employed to teach, I consider it something of a disappointment if I don't learn something myself during my teaching sessions. Sure, it is my prime responsibility to ensure that my students are given the best opportunities to learn, and I take pride in creating the best possible learning environments and experiences I can offer. The real magic occurs when we are all learning together, and I would like to argue that this should be the case in any learning environment. In his 1968 book Pedagogy of the Oppressed, Paulo Freire wrote 'Education must begin with the solution of the teacher-student contradiction, by reconciling the poles of the contradiction so that both are simultaneously teachers and students.' 

Some might complain that 'only the expert has a right to teach', or that 'students should not be allowed to go off and find out for themselves', but sadly, this is really missing the point. Every student brings their own unique knowledge and experiences into the classroom, and it's impossible for 'experts' to know everything. Let me give you a recent example: During an ICT session this week, as I made hard work of 'wiping the interactive whiteboard clean', my students pointed out to me that on Smartboards, all you need to do is circle the text you wish to delete with the wiper and then tap the middle of the text, and hey presto - the entire text disappears. Well, that was new to me, and I won't forget it - it's a new skill that will save me a lot of time and effort in the future. Now that's learning - and I'm very glad it was me on this occasion that learnt something new - from my students. But you see, there is more to learn about this incident than the fact that the students taught the teacher a new 'skill'. The students and I had a good laugh about me (a so called expert in ICT) not knowing how to use an IWB, but ultimately, the secret to good learning is that often you can't afford to be afraid to admit that you are ignorant of something. Pride often gets in the way of good learning, but sometimes we need to admit 'I don't know', and we also need to admit that students know things teachers don't. Often, being honest about your ignorance, and being open to new ways of doing and new ways of thinking, opens the door for new learning, unlearning and relearning. How many of us have sat through a lecture or conference presentation, and have been afraid to ask a question because it might make us look stupid? If we all want to ask that same simple question but we are all too afraid to do so, then that is stupid - because then the entire room remains ignorant.

There is an old Latin aphorism - Doscendo discimus - which means, we learn by teaching. Must we be so rigid in our mind set as to not see the powerful potential of this idea? Can we not break away from the idea that students are only there to learn and teachers must only teach? Can't we each do both, and isn't this exactly what Freire meant? I insist that all my students present their learning in seminars, and I also encourage questioning during these seminars. It's for a very good reason - having to stand up and explain something, means the students need to learn it first. They need to become familiar with the concept, theory, idea they will be talking about in front of their peer group. Even better, in recent years several of our Plymouth University Primary Education students have presented at conferences, Teachmeets and other public events, in front of people they have not previously met. This is really dropping them in at the deep end, but I think it's important they have the experience. They are understandably very nervous, but afterwards, each and every one of them will tell you the same story: They are glad they have had the chance to present in public, and they learn a lot from this rich experience. If you want them to learn, get them to teach.

Image by Sneebly


Creative Commons Licence
We learn by teaching by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 14, 2012

Build a powerful PLN

If you are a professional, you should have a PLN. Your PLN (personal or professional learning network) is the community of people you interact with and learn from on a regular basis. They may be people you meet on a daily basis, but more often than not in the digital age, many PLNs are comprised of people we interact with on social networking sites. In my opinion, the most powerful PLN building tool is Twitter. For me, Twitter is an incredibly powerful yet simple tool that enables me to connect with, and learn from, specialists, experts and enthusiasts in my chosen field of expertise. Put simply, I follow teachers, learning professionals and education experts from all around the world - over 1400 at my last count. I learn something new everyday, usually as a result of dialogue on Twitter, or clicking on a link someone has shared in my timeline. Many people I follow on Twitter I have never met, and perhaps I might never meet them face to face. Some are personal friends of mine. But all are individuals who I personally believe are important in the world of education. These are people I have selected to follow because they are saying things, or sharing content that interests me, and from which I can learn, contributing to my personal and professional development. You can gain an insight into ideas, content and events that would otherwise pass you by, and you can also engage in great conversations with people all over the globe who share similar interests, passions, problems and experiences. It's all a question of finding people, resources and sites that you can learn from. But how to do it, when you are in danger of being lost in a tsunami of web content? Well, there is a growing range of useful social media tools you can use to track down what you need. Such tools can help you to build your PLN into something that is powerful. The possibilities are endless, but let me share just five ways I have personally used:

One really easy way to find and connect with people who have the same interest as you is to follow hashtags on topics or events that you have an interest in. If you are a teacher for example, you may wish to follow #edchat or a Teach Meet event. If you do so, you will discover who else is following and participating in the discussion or event. Simply check out the profiles of these participants, and if you find them interesting or relevant to your own interests, click on the link to follow them. You can always unfollow later if it doesn't work out, but many Twitter users will also follow you back if they discover you have similar interests to theirs.

You can also scan the list of people other Twitter users are following and see if there are any there who might be of interest to you or relevant to your subject/topic. Select someone you are following whom you hold in high regard, and click onto their profile. Next click on the list of people they are following. If you find people on the list who interest you, click to follow them too.

Another way to find people who have a similar interest to you is to subscribe to a social bookmarking tool such as Diigo or Delicious. Such tools enable users to share URLs of web resources they find interesting. By searching and then saving useful website addresses to Diigo or Delicious, you will automatically be presented with links to other people who have also found the site interesting. One click enables you to subscribe to the feeds and bookmark collections of these people. You can also send them messages.

Still another way to build up your PLN contacts is to visit the Slideshare site and search for topics that interest you. You will quickly discover a rich vein of slide sets that have been shared by people with similar interests to you. Again, you can subscribe to their feeds and receive notification when they share a new slideset that may be of interest to you. Many of the slidesets on Slideshare are presented under Creative Commons license for free use - but do check the wording to see what the licence allows you to do.

Finally, a number of high quality blogs already exist, in just about every field of professional life. You can search for them using Google or another search engine, by selecting the 'blog' search section. When you find a blog you are interested in reading, you may be able to subscribe to it using the on site widget if there is one. If not, bookmark it on Delicious or Diigo for later use. Before you leave the blog, check to see if there is a blogroll. This is a list of other blogs the blog owner recommends, usually focused on the same or a related topic to the blog hosting the list.

Do you have other ways that are effective in building up a powerful PLN? Please share them with us in the comments box below...


Creative Commons Licence
Build a powerful PLN by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 13, 2012

10Q: Helen Keegan

We are fortunate to have many innovators in education. In the primary (elementary) and secondary (high) school sectors some can be conspicuous, because through various Teachmeets around the world, and also online during Twitter #edchats, they make their work known to the wider community. In the post-compulsory sectors of education too, there is a lot of innovation and creativity, but sometimes this can go relatively unnoticed.

One academic who personally springs to mind when we talk about creative innovation is Salford University's Helen Keegan. I first met her at a conference in Italy several years ago, and we have been friends ever since. Every time I meet up with her I'm impressed by her energy and drive, and her ability to come up with new and exciting ideas on how to engage learners. In today's 10Q interview, Helen answers questions about her philosophy on learning, social media and her current projects in higher education, including alternate reality games:



Who are you?
I’m Helen Keegan a.k.a. heloukee (online), Senior Lecturer in Interactive Media and Social Technologies at the University of Salford. I’m based in Computing, Science and Engineering, so it’s a great place to be as I get to work with techie students, but nowadays I focus on the social and cultural aspects of technology. I’ve always worked across the University, and am now based at MediaCityUK, which is ideal as it’s a multidisciplinary campus. I like to work across disciplines as I think it’s important for learners to understand different paradigms/disciplinary perspectives/assumptions. My approach to learning and teaching starts from digital identity development – I encourage learners to position themselves in their chosen field while still in education, in preparation for their professional careers.

What inspires you most about learning?
Transformation, empowerment and the unexpected: although learning what we’re ‘supposed’ to learn (I’m talking formal education here) can be empowering, the things that really excite me are often unexpected or accidental – I’m inspired by learners developing new ideas and understandings through making connections between seemingly disparate concepts and fields, and moving beyond their (disciplinary) comfort zone. While this is challenging it often leads to genuinely transformative experiences. Because I work with learners across a myriad of social platforms, I’m able to see them develop their ideas and their identities – both individual and collective - through time. This then drives the curriculum, which is ultimately inspiring: learners being able to confidently negotiate their own curriculum in collaboration with others. In terms of my own practice, students are my primary source of inspiration as reflecting on our learning journey and experiences pushes me to keep innovating. I’m also inspired on a daily basis by people I work with (especially Frances Bell, Ben Shirley and Cristina Costa) and of course my PLN (thanks to social media!).

What/who has been your biggest influence when it comes to learning?
I studied at the Royal Northern College of Music before going on to a degree in Linguistics, specialising in phonetics, speech synthesis and spectrographic analysis. During my time at the RNCM (1993-1995) I was involved in a Manchester-based multimedia collective. With a loan from the Princes Trust, we set up a studio with a 2-tonne acoustic dry room. We had a band (inc. 2 drummers – hence the dry room ;) and an orchestra. My visionary friend Carl Russell led the whole thing, although there were about 15 of us involved on a day-to-day basis. We did all sorts of live multimedia gigs with dancers, animation, video, poetry, classical music, dance music… it’s also how I got into building websites and programming (which led me through the study of Lingustics into Acoustics). It was completely informal, un-assessed, and gave me the opportunity to explore a range of disciplines (music, computing, writing, performing) and learn with a group of friends. It was a major influence on my beliefs with regards to interdisciplinarity, grassroots education and informal learning.

What does social media mean to you?
Connections and networks, serendipity and opportunity, creativity and a rapid flow/spread of ideas – energising and occasionally exhausting! In terms of my practice as an educator, I love the fact that learners can simultaneously be developing their knowledge and understanding alongside their personal portfolio and ‘professional’ online identities. They are able to make meaningful connections with others through expressing themselves as individuals and letting their personalities shine through; their opinions, interests, and activities outside of formal education. I get a real thrill seeing learners develop their digital identities and personal networks over time – I love the fact that the boundaries blur between education/industry, tutors/students, as they build their own networks and gain confidence in connecting with others online.

What is an Alternate Reality Game (ARG)?
An Alternate Reality Game uses the real world as a platform for a transmedia, interactive narrative, which unfolds according to player’s actions. Unlike video games, players don’t play as characters but generally play as themselves, interacting with the ARG designers as opposed to artificial intelligence. ARGs blur the lines between fantasy and reality, requiring collaboration and group problem solving in order to play the game. The overriding mantra for an ARG is This Is Not A Game, so it necessarily involves an element of deception.
 
How have ARGs featured in your work recently?
I recently ran a module as an ARG, as I wanted see if I could pique learners’ curiosity through introducing mystery and intrigue into their course. I worked with Hugh Garry (BBC) who had been involved with a few ARGs in the past, so his experience was invaluable. The students were fed clues in the physical world (within their scheduled classes) and also online, through blogs, Twitter, YouTube and Tumblr. It was quite intense, as we couldn’t control how students would react during the game, so there were a few tricky moments! The culmination of the ARG was the surprise public broadcast of their mobile phone films on the BBC Big Screen in the centre of Manchester – they were led to the Big Screen by a series of clues and puzzles that unfolded during the semester. It was an amazing experience! However, the jury is still out on ARGs – involvement and immersion bring the biggest rewards so there’s a risk of losing or excluding those who choose not to engage, and this was one of the biggest difficulties that we faced.

What other innovative technology supported projects have you been involved in?
The first project I worked on as a researcher/developer still sticks in my mind. My brief was to develop a multimedia CAL package (yes, back in the olden days ;) to ‘teach’ principles of acoustics. I spent a lot of time talking to undergraduate students who were struggling with certain concepts/formulas, and decided to develop a series of simulations that allowed learners to play around with waveforms using sliders, getting instant audio-visual feedback – leaving out the maths (gasp!) until they developed a more kinaesthetic sense of what was actually going on. Learners were able to get a strong feel for things like additive and subtractive synthesis, before moving on to the actual formulas. Once they had a feel for waveforms – both visually and aurally – then the formulas made a lot more sense. Very simple really, but certainly helped learners overcome the mental blocks they had developed as a result of not getting to grips with the maths in the book and on the board.
Another ‘innovative’ project would have been ESMOS – a European project that I directed/coordinated from 2004-2007. The original bid focused on the use of VLEs to support international mobility students (work placements and study exchanges) and I was brought it to run the project once the bid had been successful. I changed the focus from VLEs to open blogs, wikis etc. – might not sound like much now, but it was pretty innovative at the time (2004), and also risky in terms of it being a European funded project as it meant a significant shift away from the original proposal. However, we pulled it off and made a real contribution to international student mobility support (social, pedagogical and cultural), which was recognised by the European commission and had considerable influence on many other projects.
More recent ‘innovative’ projects have included introducing reflective practice and digital identity development through social media into science/engineering in 2006, and getting video technology students in a science faculty to make short films using their mobile phones in order to open their minds to new aesthetics and challenge their rule-governed disciplinary assumptions.

What is your recipe for good learning?
From the content perspective: relevance, personal interest and meaning (also important to understanding learner motivations). I do think emotion is important. A relaxed, happy atmosphere helps people to feel at ease, although that’s not so say that we have to be happy in order to learn - but it does help if learners are enjoying the experience. Open and honest dialogue - admitting that we all mess up sometimes, we all have valuable experiences and thoughts to share, and can all learn from one another. An environment where people aren’t afraid to make mistakes - no fear of saying the wrong thing or ‘sounding stupid’. And last but perhaps the most important ingredients – curiosity, and asking questions!

If you could change anything in higher education, what would it be?
Two things: large class sizes and assessment regimes. This is a personal perspective and not always practical in a mass HE system, but the relationships I have with my students are incredibly important in terms of our learning (I’m including myself as a learner here, because I do expect to be challenged by, and learn from, my students). Sadly, the larger the group, the less likely we are to be able to get to know one another and for me this is one of the most valuable and rewarding aspects of learning and teaching.
My second bugbear is the modularised assessment-driven culture, as this does tend to stifle curiosity. So many learners are focused on what needs to be done to pass a module with a certain mark. It’s a strategic approach to getting a degree, but I’m not a fan of the industrial model of education and sometimes it does feel more like a production plant than a place for imagination and intellectual growth. I don’t believe we should abolish Universities. Universities and academic networks play a vital role in development through research, and linking research to teaching. However, I’m not a fan of corporatisation and get frustrated with the shift towards a consumer culture.

What is your vision for the future of learning?
Greater flexibility in terms of what, where and how we learn; access to information for all; a move away from assessment culture – greater emphasis on curiosity and enjoying learning for its own sake. Alternative forms of assessment and accreditation that allow learners to define their own pathways and form communities of interest/inquiry away from modules and levels. Finally, I’d like to see greater emphasis on critical media literacy, interdisciplinarity and epistemological awareness alongside disciplinary-specific knowledge and skills. Having an open and flexible mindset is becoming increasingly important when we’re living in a rapidly changing world.

Helen Keegan is an invited Spotlight Speaker at this year's Plymouth Enhanced Learning Conference.

Creative Commons Licence
10Q Helen Keegan by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 11, 2012

10Q: Shelly Sanchez Terrell

Many would agree that Shelly Sanchez Terrell is at the top of the game when it comes to educational innovation. Just look at her profile: She is a teacher trainer, author, and international speaker, is the host of American TESOL’s Free Friday Webinars and the Social Media Community Manager for The Consultants-E. She has co-founded and organized the acclaimed educational projects, EdchatELTChatThe Reform Symposium E-Conference and the ELTON nominated Virtual Round Table language and technology conference. Her prolific presence in the educator community through social media has been recognized by several notable entities, such as The New York Times, UNESCO Bangkok, Edweek, Converge Magazine, the United Federation of Teachers, the 140 Conference, Mashable, English Central, Tefl.net, and T/H/E JOURNAL. Her education blog, Teacher Reboot Camp, is ranked as one of the top 10 language teaching and technology blogs and the 50 best blogs for education leaders. In 2012 her book, The 30 Goals Challenge for Educators will be published by Eye on Education. I'm very pleased that Shelly has agreed to contribute to my 10Q blog interview series:

How did you begin your professional career in education?
I began teaching in non-structured environments without any training until years later. I think this really helped me to observe how learning changes when we add too many rules and structure. In 1992, I began teaching innercity children through nonprofit programs and organizations in Texas. I was inspired to continue to reach out to these children and later homeless children and  troubled teens through creative writing, art, and literacy programs. In 2004, I became an English language teacher and taught students from 2 to 80 years-old in the US, Germany, and Greece. Now I train teachers online and face to face and get to see the incredible ways they are transforming their students’ lives.

What inspires you most about learning?
Learning is all around us and I am fascinated that there are always things to learn about the world and who we are and what makes us tick. As an educator I love to observe my students discover this about learning.

What does social media mean to you?
The ability to connect, collaborate, problem solve, and spread a message to millions is very powerful. Social media provides us the forum and we get to discover this incredible journey of learning and communicating with each other. This has literally been a life changing experience for me in the less than 3 years I began that journey with educators.

What is the Reform Symposium?
The Reform Symposium is a free online global conference that takes place over the course of 3 days and focuses on ways to transform education. The 3rd one took place this past July with over 4100 attendees from over 100 different countries entering online video meeting rooms where they could chat with each other, watch speakers on webcams, and see slides. Attendees could choose to attend any of the 80 presentations conducted by educators worldwide or watch our 12 inspiring keynote speakers, such as you, Steve! We appreciate you inspiring us. This conference is organised by educators for educators and the presentations are so moving that many of our attendees are moved to tears and say it is a life changing experience.

What other innovative projects are you currently working on?
The 30 Goals Challenge - Over 7000 educators worldwide have participated in accomplishing goals to transform their classrooms and impact their students. Educators who join receive a free ebook and have access to several videos and podcasts to help them achieve their goals. More importantly they get to reflect upon these goals on Twitter, Facebook, or on their blogs and receive the support of many educators also accomplishing these goals.
The Virtual Round Table E-Conference - another free online conference I help organize that focuses on language and technology. Participants can attend via a live video conference or in Second Life.
The Digital Storytelling for Young Learners EVO Session- a free online 5 week course that starts January 9th and ends February 12th. It is basically a MOOC (Massive Open Online Course). Over 200 educators worldwide have already signed up and will be playing with various tools while learning about digital storytelling.

What are the barriers to good learning?
I see many people who have gone through the rigors of the education system and lose their love for learning. They begin to equate learning to what is forced upon them in schools and forget the excitement of always being curious and searching for answers, finding different solutions, and having many more questions. I think the greatest barrier to good learning is that society tries too hard to control and standardized a process that is very individualized.

If you could change anything in education, what would it be?
I would change how education policy is decided and implemented. I would also change who gets to make the decisions about education policy.

What is your vision for the future of learning?
I hope many more teachers will become excited and passionate about learning through their participation on social networks. I think this trend will continue. Hopefully we can start some grassroots movements and inspire educators to get back to the roots of what makes learning so wonderful- having the ability to nurture our curiosity while exploring many solutions. In order for this to occur we have to get rid of standardized testing that teaches students there is only one right answer.

What important message do teachers need to hear?
Everyday that a teacher meets with their learners, that teacher will impact their lives. The choice and power is ours to decide what kind of impact that will be.

What links would you like to share?
I shared them above or in my bio :-)


Creative Commons Licence
10Q Shelly Sanchez Terrell by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 10, 2012

Get shorty

The Shorty Awards are with us again. The strapline on the official website declares that the awards are there to honour 'the best producers of short content on social media'. The Shorty Awards are an annual bash, and each year there are bazillions of categories, some bizarre, some unrepeatable. But if you wish to vote for your favourite tweeter, categories you may be interested in include blogger, science, video blogger and social media. There is even an education category - one that has been 'community created'. Everyone who is nominated for an award gets the chance to answer some questions in a 140 character Twitter interview. It's all good fun, and it's worth checking out some of the nominations and categories, even if you are not directly involved. Below is my Twitter interview from last year, and with the exception of one minor adjustment from 2011 to 2012, there's not a lot else I would change.

What's your best tweet?
Help!

What are six things you could never do without?
My wife, three children and two laptops, Nigel and Keith

How do you use Twitter in your professional life?
To learn, connect, share, converse and learn

What's your favorite Twitter app?
Tweetdeck (when it works)

Twitter or Facebook?
Oh, Twitter, of course

What was the funniest trend you've seen?
#hobbitpop - Dark Riders in the Sky - by Elvish Presley

What feature should Twitter add?
8 additional characters (Snow White and the Seven Dwarves)

Who do you wish had a Twitter feed but doesn't?
My Grandmother (she's dead)

What are some words or phrases you refuse to shorten for brevity?
abbreviation, contraction and elipsis

Is there someone you want to follow you who doesn't already? If so, who?
Gwyneth Paltrow, Lady Ga Ga, Pink, Lily Allen and Christopher Biggins

Have you ever unfollowed someone? Who and why?
I unfollowed 'Elvis Presley' when I discovered he was an imposter

Why should we vote for you?
Vote for me because you want to

Terms you wish would start trending on Twitter right now?
@timbuckteeth and Saskatchewan (not together though)

What's the most interesting connection you've made through Twitter?
They are all interesting connections. I couldn't possibly, er...

Hashtag you created that you wish everyone used?
#timforbed

How do you make your tweets unique?
I use coloured or patterned backgrounds

What inspires you to tweet?
Great ideas, interesting news items, inspiring people and ketchup

Ever get called out for tweeting too much?
No never

140 characters of advice for a new user?
Don't listen to anyone - do it your way (please feel free to ignore this advice)

How long can you go without a tweet?
Until the echo of my previous tweet is no longer reverberating

Who do you admire most for his or her use of Twitter?
@CosmoCat (Chahira Nouira)

Why'd you start tweeting?
It was a part of my community service order

Has Twitter changed your life? If yes, how?
Yes, as much as a tool can change you - it has given me a larger PLN (I'm not boasting, really, I'm not)

What do you wish people would do more of on Twitter?
Retweet my tweets

How will the world change in the next year?
Everyone will get rid of their 2011 calendars

What are some big Twitter faux pas?
Spelling French words wrong nest pas?

What will the world be like 10 years from now?
emotional

Image by Photoverulam


Creative Commons Licence
Get shorty by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 09, 2012

Learning, unlearning and relearning

We all value learning. And much of what we have learnt can be difficult to unlearn. Usually that's a good thing. But there are times when unlearning just has to be done. Sometimes it's impossible to learn new things if you don't unlearn some of the old stuff you are hanging on to. At the extreme end, a lot of irrational beliefs and prejudices are based on what we have learnt and find we now cannot relinquish. It's a principle a number of clinical interventions such as cognitive behavioural therapy are based upon. Phobias and other psychological challenges have their genesis in the act of learning a response to a given situation and then being incapable of unlearning that response.

Times are changing. Kathy Sierra features a timeline on her blog which suggests that the 1970s and 80s were about how well we could learn, the 1990s and 2000s focused on how fast and how much we could learn, whilst today's education should be based on how much we can unlearn. And, she says, learning to let go of old and out of date rules is one of the skills we all need to develop. Futurologist Jack Uldrich is applying the same principle to the medical profession, arguing that the key to unlearning is to come to the realisation that 'we are all in a fog', and can't clearly see the future. Unlearning will be a strategy for coping with rapid change and uncertainties, he argues. Philosopher Trevor Pateman sees a barrier that often stops unlearning from occurring. We are living in an acquisitive society, he says, where learning theorists talk about acquisition and retention of knowledge, but they never refer to giving away or expulsion. But unlearning is not simply about forgetting something, he continues, sometimes it is about rejecting a previously held belief, or repudiating a long revered theory. This often feels counterintuitive for educators, and can pose a threat to many learners.

Our current school systems are designed around learning as the acquistion of knowledge. The challenge is to try to turn this around so that students have the opportunity not just to learn new things, but also the challenge to unlearn and then relearn. What would it take for schools to begin structuring unlearning and relearning activities into their curricula? Often it is the task of the skilled educator to deconstruct, confront and challenge so that unlearning and then relearning can be facilitated. The Towers of Hanoi puzzle is a classic example of this kind of creative destruction. I often use it during workshops to demonstrate the idea of unlearning and relearning. You need to constantly dismantle what you have built in order to successfully solve the puzzle. This construction metaphor is quite helpful. An unsafe building is a danger to the public, and must be demolished before a newer, more functional and safe building can be constructed in its place. It is the same with theories and beliefs that are past their sell by date. I hope I made this clear in my blog post A convenient untruth. Sometimes we really do need to knock things down before we can build them up again.

Image by Nualabugeye


Creative Commons Licence
Learning, unlearning and relearning by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 07, 2012

An academic writes...

As a part of the forthcoming REF (Research Excellence Framework) I plan to submit several of my recently published works for consideration. As an eminent researcher in my field this is expected of me. One piece I am submitting, of which I am justifiably proud, is entitled: Precapitalist Sublimations: The dialectic paradigm of narrative and postcultural discourse around the works of Oliver Stone. Published in 2009 in Volume 91, Issue 4 of the journal Social Realism, my paper performs a complex Derridian critique of Lacan's Semanticist Model. In a sense, the subject is interpolated into a Sartreist absurdity (redolent of the early work of the late Czech playright dissident Vaclav Havel), and includes art as a 'reality' within the discourse. Lacan's model of the semanticist paradigmatic shift toward reality implies a narrative of sexual identity, and perhaps surprisingly, has a great deal of intrinsic post-modernist meaning.

There has been severe, and if I may be frank, undeserving criticism, against the Research Assessment Exercise (RAE) and its successor, the forthcoming REF. Here I wish to offer a rebuttal to those detractors who for whatever reasons consider the system to be flawed or unfair.

Firstly, the fact that Social Realism has a very small readership of around a dozen subscribers should not detract from its very high impact ranking of 3.6. It has a long and illustrious history of over 90 years, throughout which time the members of the editorial board have been a constant presence. Impact factors for each journal are calculated over a three year period on the average number of times its articles are cited in other articles appearing in the list of indexed journals. It goes without saying that the new fangled open access journals are rightly excluded from this elite list, due to their less rigorous standards of reviewing, the free and open nature of online publication, not to mention their substantial readership. My fellow authors and I are more than capable of compensating for the small but select readership of Social Realism by ensuring that we cite our own and each other's articles copiously in all our subsequently published papers to maintain the superior impact rating of the journal. This is only fair under the circumstances.

Secondly, doubt has been expressed over the capabilities of the appointed REF panel of experts (pictured above during their innaugural meeting in 1906) to fairly or competently judge the quality of research outputs across the board. I am happy to refute these claims, on the basis that three of the members of the panel are close friends of mine and the fourth is a member of my own family. I can assure all those who have made such claims, that the panel are all exceptionally talented people who are extremely knowledgeable in their respective fields and each is totally impervious to bribes or any other form of cajolement. Some also sit on the editorial boards of Social Realism and other journals I have published in, so their integrity is not to be doubted. Those who doubt any of the panel's capabilities, academic or otherwise can be assured. Each and every one of the expert panel has been certified.

Thirdly, the fact that I have a full time and permanent academic contract of employment with my institution means that I am eligible to submit to the REF, and will therefore be in the running to attract research funds from central government should my published works be deemed to merit it (I am confident that they will, but am not at liberty to say why). Many of my lesser academic colleagues are on fixed term or part-time contracts and unfortunately (but rightly) will not be eligible to submit. Although their published research is exemplary, the temporary nature of their employment status militates against them. Their research is thus deemed to be inadmissible, and this is only reasonable under the circumstances. Full-time permanent academic contracts must be earned on merit, and are not just given away freely to any Thomas, Richard or Harold.

Fourthly, that my research for the above article was neither empirical, nor quasi-experimental, but rather was carried out entirely as a result of personal introspection, is neither here nor there. The fact that it has been published in a high ranking journal ensures that I will almost certainly attract a 4* star rating (world leading research) and will therefore be eligible for substantial research funding. My work was double blind peer reviewed by two eminent and highly respected members of an elite academic review panel and after minor changes, was accepted for publication in the illustrious said journal.

And finally, it matters not that some claim the title and content of my published paper were generated by a spoof post-modernist essay generator. These are scurrilous accusations and borne out of pure academic jealousy. It is neither the unfamiliar sequence of the words, their apparently dense and pretentious verbosity, nor their perceived lack of coherent meaning that should be called into question here. Rather, it is the concept that is important, and of course its post-modernist interpretation. That my article could be considered by some ill-informed individuals to be little more than supercilious nonsense is at best irrelevant and at worst pure unsubstantiated opinion. The same accusation was levelled at Foucault, and look what happened to him. Instead, it is incontrovertible fact that double reviews by two blind academic peers have resulted in a major publication in a highly berated journal. This ensures that my article (and its companion submissions) will be taken into full consideration by the REF evaluation panel without question, and that in due course, I am confident that my institution will be commensurately rewarded with substantial research money from public funds, to which of course I shall be given privileged access, for the funding of subsequent research. In the final analysis, and under the circumstances, that is all that really matters. My journal article is below. Judge for yourself:

Precapitalist Sublimations: The dialectic paradigm of narrative and postcultural discourse around the works of Oliver Stone
Social Realism
2009; 91 (4), pp 16-18.

In the works of Oliver Stone, a predominant concept is that of subpatriarchial art. Geoffrey [1] states that we must choose between Lacanist obscurity and Derridaist reading. “Society is dead,” says Lacan. It could be said that Baudrillard uses the term ‘nihilism’ to denote not narrative as such, but neonarrative. The main theme of the works of Stone is the fatal flaw, and subsequent rubicon, of capitalist class. Therefore, the ground/figure distinction depicted in Stone’s JFK is also evident in Platoon. The primary theme of Scuglia’s [2] critique of subdialectic capitalist theory is the bridge between sexuality and sexual identity.

It could be said that Bataille uses the term ‘nihilism’ to denote a mythopoetical whole. The characteristic theme of the works of Stone is not materialism, but prematerialism. In a sense, Debord uses the term ‘Lacanist obscurity’ to denote the common ground between class and language. Many discourses concerning a self-justifying reality exist.

If one examines Batailleist 'powerful communication', one is faced with a choice: either accept Lacanist obscurity or conclude that class has significance, but only if art is equal to consciousness; if that is not the case, we can assume that the task of the writer is significant form. It could be said that the subject is interpolated into a Batailleist 'powerful communication' that includes art as a whole. The premise of Lacanist obscurity suggests that truth, somewhat paradoxically, has intrinsic meaning.

“Sexual identity is part of the meaninglessness of narrativity,” says Sartre; however, according to Long [3] , it is not so much sexual identity that is part of the meaninglessness of narrativity, but rather the absurdity of sexual identity. In a sense, in JFK, Stone deconstructs Batailleist 'powerful communication'; in Platoon he examines nihilism. Baudrillard promotes the use of subdialectic narrative to read society.

“Consciousness is fundamentally unattainable,” says Lacan. It could be said that if Batailleist 
powerful communication' holds, we have to choose between nihilism and deconstructivist predialectic theory. Marx uses the term ‘textual discourse’ to denote the role of the observer as participant. Therefore, Foucault’s essay on nihilism implies that truth may be used to entrench class divisions. The main theme of Bartok's [4] model of Batailleist powerful communication' is a mythopoetical paradox.

In a sense, nihilism states that context is created by the collective unconscious, but only if Bataille’s essay on postcapitalist conceptual theory is valid; otherwise, Derrida’s model of Batailleist `powerful communication’ is one of “Marxist capitalism”, and hence dead. The example of neotextual capitalism prevalent in Stone’s Natural Born Killers emerges again in Platoon, although in a more semioticist sense.

It could be argued that the subject is contextualised into a Lacanist obscurity that includes language as a totality. Hubbard [5] suggests that we have to choose between nihilism and cultural Marxism. However, Bataille suggests the use of pretextual discourse to challenge sexism. The subject is interpolated into a Lacanist obscurity that includes narrativity as a whole. In a sense, the primary theme of the works of Stone is not deconstruction per se, but postdeconstruction. Derrida uses the term 
Batailleist powerful communication' to denote a mythopoetical reality.

Dialectic capitalism and neoconstructive discourse. If one examines nihilism, one is faced with a choice: either reject Lacanist obscurity or conclude that culture is used to marginalize minorities. But Lyotard promotes the use of nihilism to deconstruct and read society. The characteristic theme of Finnis’s [6] analysis of textual narrative is the stasis, and eventually the futility, of neostructural class.

“Truth is part of the collapse of consciousness,” says Sartre. However, the subject is contextualised into a Lacanist obscurity that includes language as a paradox. Marx suggests the use of Sontagist camp to challenge class divisions. The main theme of the works of Stone is not, in fact, theory, but pre-theory. Therefore, the premise of Lacanist obscurity states that society has objective value. Bataille promotes the use of nihilism to modify class.

“Society is meaningless,” says Foucault. It could be said that several materialisms concerning neoconstructive discourse may be found. The subject is interpolated into a Lacanist obscurity that includes art as a whole.

In a sense, many theories concerning the role of the artist as observer exist. In Natural Born Killers, Stone affirms cultural subdialectic theory; in Platoon, however, he denies neoconstructive discourse. But the characteristic theme of de Selby’s [7] critique of Lacanist obscurity is the bridge between narrativity and society. The subject is contextualised into a nihilism that includes culture as a reality.

It could be said that if Lacanist obscurity holds, we have to choose between nihilism and Marxist class. Bataille’s model of cultural narrative holds that the law is part of the failure of consciousness. Therefore, Debord uses the term ‘nihilism’ to denote the role of the reader as poet. Lacanist obscurity states that art serves to reinforce the status quo, given that truth is interchangeable with narrativity. It is contentious that the subject is interpolated into a neoconstructive discourse that includes culture as a paradox. A number of deconstructions concerning Lacanist obscurity may thus be revealed.

Bibliography
1. Geoffrey, J. Y. ed. (1983) The Expression of Failure: Lacanist obscurity and nihilism. Oxford: Oxford University Press
2. Scuglia, V. Q. B. (1972) Nihilism in the works of Koons. New York: Quartermaine.
3. Long, R. E. ed. (1981) The Burning Sky: Nihilism and Lacanist obscurity. University of Illinois Press
4. Bartok, R. (1993) Lacanist obscurity and nihilism. Berlin: Schlangekraft
5. Hubbard, F. I. ed. (1984) Subcapitalist Theories: Nihilism and Lacanist obscurity. London: Loompanics
6. Finnis, Q. (1975) Lacanist obscurity and nihilism. London: Bow and Sons.
7. de Selby, R. U. P. ed. (1992) The Futility of Reality: Nihilism in the works of Eco. San Francisco: O’Reilly Associates

Image source


Creative Commons Licence
An academic writes... by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 05, 2012

Those who are about to blog...

If you are considering taking up blogging this year, and wondering what it might involve, I would be happy to offer you a few tips from my own experience. I have been blogging for just over 5 years and during that time have learnt a few things. Blogging can be a thoroughly absorbing activity, which ultimately will pay you back as much as you invest in it, and also some interest. It can also be a very creative pastime, enabling you to develop your ideas, and sound them out in public. I have already written extensively about the benefits of blogging for professionals in several previous posts including Seven reasons teachers should blog, so I won't elaborate here. What I will do though in the space I have on this post, is offer you some caveats, and a few words of advice...

Firstly, blogging can be time consuming. It's not quite the 'time sink' that Patricia Wallace (1999) warned about, but it can take up a lot of your time, especially if you are a bit of a perfectionist. You may also struggle at first to think up ideas for your blog. However, the more you involve yourself in your own sphere of professional practice, the more you will find to write about. Social media such as Twitter provide a lot of inspiration. Get networking and you'll have a lot to write about. Before long, if you persist with your writing and don't give up, you will have a growing archive of blog posts to look back on.

Secondly, you may not receive a lot of interest at first for your blogging. There are probably many other blogs already that represent your field (unless you are extremely specialised), so there is a lot of competition for people's attention. But don't let that put you off - join in. Some of your posts may go unread, and even if people do read them, you may not receive any comments. Persevere. The more you blog, you more likely you are to receive comments, especially if your content is useful, controversial or laced with humour. Some people blog simply to get their ideas down in some concrete form. This is valuable in itself, because sometimes you don't know what you are thinking until you externalise it in some tangible way.

Thirdly, if your site becomes popular, and you gain a large audience, you may begin to receive spam messages and comments on your blog. You can detect them easily, because they normally arrive as a bland message along the lines of 'I enjoy reading your blog because it is very interesting to me', often in bad English, and then accompanied by the tell-tale hyperlink. I learned very early on to moderate comments to my blog, and these kind of comments are deleted very quickly in the filtering stage. Moderating comments can be a little more time consuming than open comments, but it's worth the extra effort to filter out the dross and maintain some sort of quality control over your content.

Some people may approach you with ideas or contributions for a guest blog. Again, treat these offers with caution. A few are quite genuine, but many are opportunists who wish to gain some exposure on your site, but don't actually have a lot to offer. If you are interested, ask for a sample of their writing before you go any further. Often the question is, do these would-be bloggers not have a blog of their own? And if they do, why are they bothering you? I wrote about this problem in a post a year ago.

Finally, you will need to develop a thick skin. If your site becomes popular, you will present a target that is there to be shot at. Not everyone will agree with what you say, which is usually very healthy. Those who disagree with you will say so, and some will not be particularly kind in their comments. Some may even make quite personal comments, but this often reveals more about them than about the topic under discussion. Ultimately, all comments that engage with the topic you have blogged should be welcomed, because they lead to dialogue that makes people think. There are some though, who have an agenda of their own, whether it is self-promotion, or just trouble making. Occasionally you may receive a comment that is abusive. It is up to you to decide whether you allow such comments to appear. Some argue that 'feeding the trolls' is a bad idea, and simply delete such messages. Others welcome them and respond appropriately to them.

So if you are embarking on blogging, remember - it is a public space. What you write becomes a part of your digital identity. Some of your writing will be misunderstood, some will be much appreciated by those who read it. Sometimes it's a walk in the park, but occasionally it can be an arena in which a form of gladiatorial combat can take place. So speak softly, but carry a big stick.

Reference
Wallace, P. (1999) The Psychology of the Internet. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Image by Benjamin Cooper


Creative Commons Licence
Those who are about to blog... by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 04, 2012

The sharp end

Last year's #pencilchat hashtag was probably the best Twitter discussion I have seen or participated in. It tore into the age-old resistance to technology and all things new that we continually encounter in schools and other traditional institutions and it lampooned the laggards, change resistors and other stick-in-the-muds we all know and love. Several of us were inspired enough by the dialogue to write our own blogposts, pushing the metaphor to its limits. My own offering was entitled A Headteacher Writes. The very best thing about #pencilchat though, was its capability to focus our minds (in a fun, enjoyable way) on the serious issues we all face when we try to introduce innovative practices into conservative environments. I have written extensively on this, and I won't elaborate, but there are many causes for resistance to change. Some are more defensible than others, but any resistance to progress is merely that - resistance. Progress does not slow down to pick up stragglers. Progress does not respect barriers. It bulldozes its way through them, drives roughshod over all objections and ultimately achieves its goal. Then it makes way for even more progress, because education in this respect has the characteristic of a shark. The shark has to keep moving, swimming forwards, otherwise it dies. Education also has to move forward because if it stands still and doesn't incorporate constant progress, clear vision, innovative practices, it soon becomes irrelevant to society.

I stumbled upon this graphic earlier in the week. It comes courtesy of the Positive DV8R blog, and I wanted to share it with you. It's another simple and humorous, and yet all too painfully true pencil metaphor. Our old friend the pencil points us to definitions of six types of people you can find in any given organisation, and their various responses to innovation. The graphic is adapted from a short piece by Lindy McKeown who elaborates better than I could and is certainly worth a quick read. I wonder if you are able to identify the different responses with people you work with?


Creative Commons Licence
The sharp end by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 03, 2012

10Q: Steven Anderson

Steven W. Anderson is known to many in the world of education as a passionate and knowledgeable promoter of social media and technology for learning. He has been a prime mover in some of the most innovative projects for technology supported learning in the past few years. He was co-creator of the Twitter weekly discussion group #Edchat and he hosts the Web 2.0 Connected Classroom blog. Most recently he was selected to be a panelist at the #140 Conference in Los Angeles, organized by Vonage founder Jeff Pulver where he discussed the impact of Twitter and other social media on education. As part of the conference he was one of the first recipients of the NOW Award, recognizing the "Movers and Shakers" in the world of Social Media. He returned to the #140 Conference in 2010 as a featured speaker, this time in New York City. Steven was voted the Most Influential Tweeter in the Edublog Awards 2009 for his part in helping to create #Edchat which now has over 500 weekly participants. With over 37,000 followers on Twitter - where he is @web20classroom - it is clear that Steven has a lot of important things to say, and he should be given plenty of space to speak. I'm delighted that Steven has agreed to participate in my 10Q series of interviews with education innovators.

How did you start out in education?
I took a very traditional road to the classroom. I went to college wanting to be a teacher. For the longest time I thought I would be teaching music. I was in marching band all through high school and in college as a tuba player and thought that would continue into my career. In the middle of my sophomore year I volunteered in a Kindergarten classroom a few days a week reading to kids and working on colors and shapes. It was then I realized that I wanted to be in the classroom. So I changed majors and graduated a few years later with a degree in Middle Grades Math and Science Education.

What inspires you to continue working in education?
I love the idea of learning and I love to learn. The more involved I get in education through what I do, the more I get to learn. I enjoy spending time watching kids be curious and discover their world. While I work mainly with adults I cherish the moments I get to spend in the classroom talking to kids. It is the drive to constantly be better for them that brings me back everyday. I want to create learning environments for them that allow them to be kids.

Why are you so passionate about using social media?
Social media has done so much for my own personal and professional learning. Sure, sending tweets and posting on Nings has had a great impact on my thinking and doing, but it's more than that. It is the personal connections that I have made with people from all over the world. My thinking gets pushed everyday because of my involvement in those spaces. And think about it from the seats our kids sit in. It's one thing to read about the Arab Spring in an article or watch a video on YouTube about it but it's a whole other, powerful deal to talk to someone who lived it. Or for some Kindergarten students to see something like the weather around the world everyday, is just moving. I started in social media to share resources easily with teachers in a very small district. And for me it has grown into something more powerful than resources and tools. It is a constant learning, growing and sharing experience.

What is the idea behind #Edchat?
#Edchat started as an idea between Tom Whitby, Shelly Terrell and myself. Tom loves to ask questions and get people thinking. He is an instigator. He had this idea of a weekly chat where we asked a question to the educational community to get people talking and ideas flowing. Shelly and I helped, initially on the organization and getting the word out. Over 2 years and 100 chats later it has been an incredible experience to be a part of. Not only do we have our main chat at 7pm EST but we grew into a chat for folks in Europe and Asia at 12pm EST. And it has helped create other specialty chats in all sorts of educational topics. Some think of the chats as echo chambers and maybe sometimes they are but we always want people to share their action steps. #Edchat is more than talk. Its about action and causing real change wherever we are.

What other innovative projects have you been involved with?
In my district I have been involved with a big push to get kids learning about social media and their digital selves as early as possible. One of our elementary schools came to me and a colleague wanting their school to better understand the role social media could play in not only the learning of the students but the learning of the educators as well. So we worked with the school the entire year talking to the students, K-5, about digital footprints and how to be a good digital citizen. We worked with the parents to help them understand the same, and to help them see that social media and online learning can be beneficial for even kids that young. And with the teachers we developed a social media policy that embraced its use in the classroom rather than ban it. It was so successful we are working with more schools this year, and our district leadership is looking at adopting the policy we create, district wide.

What are the barriers to good learning?
Most of the time it's adults. A lot of what I see, are adults getting in the way of good, solid learning. There are lots of people who have ideas for what could be better or what needs to be better in education. And most of the time those ideas are self-serving. If we could let teachers teach and kids learn, I think all would be well.

If you could change anything in education, what would it be?
I wish I could change perception. Take social media for example. There is a perception by some in education (and more not) that it has absolutely no place in education. Because of the way celebrities use the products or the way people abuse the products that, to some, instantly means there is no educational value. The same can be said of the educational technology movement. Some say that computers, iPads, tablets, have no place in the classroom. Kids need to learn math and learn how to read and kids only use those devices to play games, not to learn. So to that end I just want people to know that kids can learn with social media and educators can grow and learn with it too. And cellphones, iPads, tablets, computers, laptops, games, pretty much the stuff I fight for in classrooms everyday, have value and can help kids learn and discover and grow.

What is your vision for the future of education?
I would like to see a point at which access for all isn't an issue. Access to information is power, and all kids deserve to be powerful. So when all kids have access to information, what they learn changes completely. I would like to see more emphasis placed on creating, debating, communicating and collaborating. I would also like to see a point at which kids get to pick courses they are interested in. The Open Courses from MIT and Stanford are so intriguing to me. I think schools could be more like that and offer kids the opportunity to learn what is interesting to them. And those classes may be offered in their school, or maybe online or virtually. So maybe the idea of school as we know it now will be different and I am excited about that possibility.

What message do you have for teachers?
Focus on kids. Forget about the other stuff. The reason we are in this business is for kids, plain and simple. When we spend our time and efforts and attention on them, then we can go home at the end of the day knowing we've done a good job.

What links would you like to share?
My Blog
My Twitter
#Edchat Archive

NB: Shelly Terrell will feature in a future 10Q interview on this blog.


Creative Commons Licence
10Q: Steven Anderson by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 02, 2012

Learning and performance

Learning is performance. No matter what we learn, our knowledge, skills (and also our attitudes) are usually externalised in some kind of outward expression. Some are obvious: Learning a language will lead to conversation. Acquiring dexterity in art results in the production of artifacts. Learning to play an instrument ultimately results in some form of musical performance. Such performances don't have to be public, but often they are. Some are less obvious - learning complex mathematical formulae will result in applying these to mathematical problems. Learning engineering will result in the construction of engines, bridges, walls, buildings, etc. The image above, taken in Melbourne, Australia, is a performance of learning that includes several disciplines, including engineering, design, construction and mathematics. We talk about 'becoming'. Becoming a nurse, carpenter, doctor, lawyer, technician, accountant, teacher. On our journey of becoming, we engage in a great deal of performance.

Some of our earliest performances, particularly in formal learning contexts (school, college, university), are under the scrutiny of subject experts who award grades, and ultimately, some form of accreditation. This kind of performance is commonly referred to as formal assessment. Sadly, it is often the case that the measure of performance is not fit for purpose, as we have all witnessed recently in the universal failure of standardised testing, or the exam paper fiascos that continually assail our senses via the media. Some forms of assessment are ill suited because they are not designed to measure important aspects of learning, or more commonly, are too narrow to consider the entire performance. Inappropriate assessment methods can be a disaster.

'Everyone is a genius. But if you judge a fish by its ability to climb a tree, it will live its whole life believing it is stupid.' - Albert Einstein

Yet the externalisation of learning - knowledge performance - is a vitally important part of the learning process, not only for the student, but also for the entire community they live within. It is important for the student's motivation and also, if done properly, will provide the student with feedback on how to improve the performance next time. It is important for the community, because the community needs skilled and knowledgeable members, and some form of check is required to ensure that the skill or knowledge is up to date, safe to use, and is relevant for the needs of society. If we get assessment wrong, we fail the student, and ultimately we fail society.

But what of those who have already become? Do they stop becoming? The answer of course, is no - we continue to become, because we do not stop learning and we continue to perform our knowledge. For performers, there have never been more channels, stages and platforms upon which we can perform our knowledge than there are in today's media rich and internet aware society. More and more people are performing their knowledge online to a potentially worldwide audience, through blogs, through YouTube and on other popular social media channels such as Twitter, Facebook, Flickr. Blogging and other user generated content practices enable us to focus our performance of knowledge and project it toward relevant peer groups. These are powerful practices because of their immediacy and accessibility; and having an audience raises your game. Some performances provoke comments from the community - a form of peer review that works as a professional assessment of thoughts and ideas, invention, ways of articulating, strength of argument, contribution to debate, illustration of points and reflective criticality. This represents the conversation as curriculum I wrote about in a recent post. But this curriculum extends beyond conversation into community. Knowledge performance is at the centre of community as curriculum.  From the sharing of knowledge comes the discourse that adds to everyone's collective knowledge within the community of practice, and extends its boundaries. It is this sharing of experience, new ideas, contention and support that advances the community of practice exponentially. The tools are here to achieve it. Performance of knowledge through social media will be one of the vital components of education and training in the coming years.


Creative Commons Licence
Learning and performance by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


January 01, 2012

10Q: David Mitchell

I ended 2011 with a post called Four game changers which featured four key innovators who are radically transforming education. Throughout 2012 I plan to feature more educators who are doing significant work in schools, colleges and universities, and who in their own ways are changing teaching and learning. Each will answer ten questions about their life, their opinions and their professional practice in education. In this first of my 10Q posts, I interview David Mitchell, Deputy Head Teacher of Heathfield Community Primary School in Bolton, who talks about his hopes and aspirations for schools in the future, and how social media tools such as blogs, and his concept of QuadBlogging are having a positive impact on primary education at an international level.

Who are you?
My name is David Mitchell (aka @DeputyMitchell) I am the Deputy Headteacher at Heathfield Community Primary School in Bolton. I have been the Acting Headteacher since the summer of 2011 but now look forward to handing over the reigns to our new Headteacher from January 1st 2012. In addition to my official role, I am also a Google Certified Teacher from the first Google Teacher Academy outside of the USA. I am also a Toshiba Education Ambassador and have been fortunate enough to have been on the receiving end of some awards in 2010 and 2011.

What first attracted you to teaching?
My father (@gog40) was a teacher so I have always had teaching in my blood. However, that isn't the reason I wanted to become a teacher. I didn't do very well at school due to many factors, the biggest being that I wasn't challenged or engaged. I left school with only 2 GCSEs after my first attempt with an additional 3 after my second attempt. Although I tried many other paths to employment, my learning journey only began the moment I started my teaching degree in 1993. I truly thought that I could make learning more engaging than my teachers did for me. I wanted to prove to Mr. Clegg (Maths teacher from my school) that I wasn't the class clown.

What excites you now about teaching?
The tools at my disposal excite me! I have seen the most powerful learning moments come when my pupils learn with me and learning isn't done 'to them' but 'with them'. As I have said above, my learning journey began the moment I started my teaching degree, I'm still on that journey and so long as I keep excited about learning then my learners will too. I'm so excited about the unknown future that we are preparing our learners for. There isn't a checklist of things we need to tick off. So long as my learners LOVE learning they will be able to tackle the unknown the future will undoubtedly throw at them.

What would you change in education if you had the opportunity?
If I had the chance to change things in education, I would take education out of the hands of politicians. Education needs protecting from the games of politics. I think the profession isn't used enough in the governance of education, how come one man or one woman's vision for education can become policy? There are teachers, school leaders and Governors out there who have decades of experience who should be able to guide progress in education with much more impact than the current system. I don't have the answers but if the politicians asked the profession how education could improve I have 100% faith that we'd get it absolutely right!

Why is blogging so important in education?
Blogging suffers from a very narrow definition! I know this as I'm that blogging bloke who was on the telly. What many people don't know is the pedagogy behind the good practice that goes into the learning behind a great blog.

Firstly, a blog is an outcome, this outcome has seen many stages before it is made public. And in the public nature of the outcome lies the magic of the engagement that so many teachers that use blogging preach about.

"The child's tray is a hospice for their writing, where their writing goes to die." (Bill Lord, 2011) This concept is so easy for me to understand as this is what my own education lacked. We ask our learners to consider their audience daily or weekly. What's the point when they are writing for their teacher alone? From my experience the learner also knows what we will be writing in their books for developmental points too. Give a learner a global platform to publish their learning and you'll see these learners apply 100% effort because if they don't, their audience will tell them!

At another level blogging is so important in education because of the community that surrounds it - a generous group of sharing learners all at different levels of their learning journeys. Comments from other learners are more powerful than any other comments. Over the last 12 months, my learners have received over 8,000 comments. These 8,000 comments are sometimes 300-400 words long with links to examples and suggestions too. How powerful is that? More powerful than my 3 stars and a wish? My learners think so!

What do teachers need to know about social media in schools?
Teachers need to know that social media doesn't need to hurt. From Facebook to Twitter, from YouTube to Blogging, put these tools in the hands of an educator who has a sensible outlook about how these tools can be used and you'll see the benefit from the learning that is taking place at the hands of that educator. Collaboration, teamwork and peer support are all offspring of effective use of social media in my classroom. Once you embrace a tool like Twitter you'll have access to many people that have already used social media within schools and they will be more than happy to share the experiences.

What is QuadBlogging?
QuadBlogging was born out of a tiny idea to help out a school that was doing some fantastic blogging but not getting the audience that they deserved. There was a danger that the pupils and teachers might lose interest. This would have been a travesty as the learning being showcased on their class blogs was wonderful. Heathfield is blessed with a very healthy audience and I also knew a couple of other people who also had a healthy audience. I saw an opportunity where 3 schools could help one school. This is where the number 4 and the term Quad came from. Each week one of the 4 classes or schools would be the focus where the other 3 classes or schools would visit during that week and leave comments for the learners. Each week would see a new school out of the 4 being the focus school/class and this would be repeated for the 4 weeks. While setting up this Quad, I publicised it on Twitter and within a few days about 10 other teachers asked if they could be a part of this QuadBlogging.

The concept has remained the same, however, the organisation be behind the scenes hasn't. Going from 4 classes to approximately 1000 from 25 countries has been a tricky project to manage. Each quad now has a volunteer from within that quad to be the Quad Coordinator, responsible for communication between the adults in the quad resulting in a smooth cycle where each class knows which is the focus class. The tools behind the scenes have also evolved. A Google Form linked to a spreadsheet embedded within the Quadblogging blog makes organising each quad quite easy. Up to now, QuadBlogging has directly impacted around 40,000 pupils from all over the globe.

What positive outcomes of quadblogging have you personally seen in schools?
Gathering evidence of impact from Quadblogging classes has proved fairly hard. It has been obvious from tweets from Quadblogging teachers that the impact is there in engaging the pupils and springing life into class blogs that might have been slipping down slope. It has also been evident that Quadblogging has added a global dimension that had previously been missing. There are more and more comments each month on the Quadblogging site: QuadBlogging Highlights. There is also a very nice tool called Scoop.It that collects Quadblogging posts on this site:

I am still working on gathering more evidence of the impact that Quadblogging has had on pupils, classes and teachers. If anyone has any suggestions, please add them to your comments!

What is your vision for the future of education?
My vision for education is one of 'For learners by learners'. I want to see developments and progress in education directly influenced by the profession. It's OK that we don't know what our learners will doing in 20 years time. Have teachers ever had crystal balls? The future of education will need to produce learners who have simply 3 things:

1. Experience of successful collaboration
2. How to quickly find out things they don't know
3. A love of learning

What links do you wish to share?
My Blog
QuadBlogging
Heathfield School Website

David Mitchell is one of the invited Spotlight speakers at Pelecon 2012.

Image courtesy of David Mitchell


Creative Commons Licence
10Q: David Mitchell by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


December 29, 2011

Four game changers

It was great to meet and talk with some very creative and inspirational people during my travels in 2011. Here are four people I spent some time with and whose powerful ideas are changing education:

Miguel Brechner. I spoke to Miguel Brechner after his well received keynote speech at ALT-C in Leeds this year. He requested a meeting with me after reading my blog reportage of his speech. He wanted to clarify a few points, including a response to the critique of the One Laptop Per Child projects. OLPC is premised on the basis of one child interacting with one free laptop, in many ways a counter to social forms of learning witnessed in communal contexts such as Mitra's Hole in the Wall project. Brechner is one of the few who have actually made OLPC a success, exactly where it should be achieved, in a very needy, poverty ridden region of Uruguay. He is an unassuming and self-effacing man, but Brechner is also passionate about what he has achieved in Uruguay. He has shown that providing disadvantaged young people with the appropriate tools for learning will transform them into eager and receptive learners. The laptop itself is not the inspiration, but it is certainly the gateway into inspirational experiences that lead to deep learning, and a growing awareness in the individual that they can achieve so much more as their knowledge of the world around them grows.  Brechner is not ignorant of the fact that broadband provision is a necessity for such projects to succeed, indeed he even declared that 'broadband is a human right'. He is also aware that wireless provision and the availability of mobile technologies are increasingly important for learning in remote and underprivileged areas of the world. We can expect to see more projects of a similar nature taking hold in 2012.

Wayne Mackintosh. Many will be aware of Wayne Mackintosh through his work as the founder of WikiEducator - an online community and repository of free user generated content for educators worldwide. As a prime mover in the Open Educational Resources movement, Wayne Mackintosh must feel a heavy responsibility on his shoulders. Mackintosh is a firm believer in social innovation and sees it as the only answer for sustainable education in this century. He has a vision for free and open forms of education and sees them as the only way forward for us all. He is one of a growing band of educators who spend the majority of their time campaigning to bring this radical educational change about. To help achieve this vision, Mackintosh is setting up the OER University and is evangelistic in his elucidation of this concept. This passion and the reasoning behind OERU has already convinced over a dozen institutions worldwide to commit to the delivery of cost-free accredited degree level programmes online. I spent time with Wayne in Portugal during the EFQUEL Innovation Forum, and listened to him as he expanded on his ideas for a new, democratic form of global education for all. Mackintosh believes that 'no learner should be denied access to an education because learning material is locked away behind copyright or because people may not have the resources to pay for licensed software'. There is growing presence and force behind this vision, and as the OER movement gains traction and impetus, we should expect to see some changes in the way universities offer their programmes of study.

Conrad Wolfram. The Wolfram Alpha answer engine is a distinct departure from search engines such as Google or Bing. As explained by Conrad Wolfram, the service operates on an intelligent algorithm, interrogation of the question string, and production of multiple responses via a structured database of constantly updated content. Speaking with Wolfram after the LearnTEC event near Frankfurt, Germany earlier in the year, I asked him about his vision for the future of knowledge and learning. Like many true visionaries, Wolfram comes across as humble and decent, but also extremely self-assured in his belief and mission. He makes some stark, incisive remarks about education: 'Stop teaching calculating, and start teaching maths'. He argues that the value chain of knowledge is changing, meaning that knowledge brokering is no longer the domain of the experts. This echoes sentiments of the wisdom of crowds and the power of tribes, and his argument that repositories of knowledge can become even more powerful if they are searched intelligently and using visualisation computation resonates. And as each new node and connection is created by individuals, a new democratisation of knowledge emerges says Wolfram. 'If you drive yourself, you learn more about the route than you would if you are a passenger.' This suggests that most search engines make the enquirer a mere passenger in the journey to knowledge, whilst Alpha puts the enquirer firmly in the driving seat.The tools are already available for students to do calculation, what they now need, he states, is the ability to test things and verify results. The knowledge balance in schools, said Wolfram, is all wrong at present. There is too much knowledge giving and not enough opportunity for students to test things, experiment and discover for themselves.

Douglas Thomas. I met Doug when we were both invited to keynote a conference in Barcelona this year. Together with John Seely-Brown, Doug Thomas has authored a ground breaking book entitled A New Learning Culture. In it they map out many of the profound changes that are taking place in learning places through the introduction of new technology. Doug has some marked ideas about learning in the 21st Century. He sees the transition from more or less stable and predictable contexts to a more fluid and unpredictable world as an opportunity rather than as a threat. The emergence of massively networked communication and the subsequent collaborative possibilities excite him, as do the capabilities of new social media to enable sharing and rapid amplification of ideas across the globe. His emphasis is more on learning than on teaching, a thought that is amplified in the phrase 'blogs are a medium for learning, but they do not teach'. Although this could be challenged, it is never the less a sign of things to come, where formal education is supplemented and enriched by technology mediated informal learning. Thomas also sees the importance of play in future learning scenarios, viewing it as possibly 'the single most important skill to develop for the twebty-first century.' Gamification is inevitable, and massively online social games such as World of Warcraft 'allow us to highlight the connections between knowing, making and playing'. Thomas and Seely-Brown see a new culture emerging around these ideas, and we are already seeing evidence of this culture in our schools, colleges and universities.



Image source

Creative Commons Licence
Four game changers by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


December 28, 2011

More great places, awesome people

In my last post I recalled some of the great places I went to this year and some of the awesome people I met. Continuing my review of the year, here are my top five places and some more great people of 2011.


5. Mombasa, Kenya. As a part of the International Federation for Information Processing event calendar (IFIP Education Committee) I was invited to keynote a conference in Mombasa in August. I have heard so much about Kenya, but had never been to East Africa before this excursion. I arrived tired after two flights totaling almost 10 hours, and stepped out into the sauna. Mombasa is south of the equator, and in August is supposed to be in winter, but at 28 degrees with 90 percent humidity, you could have fooled me. Mombasa is an island city of almost 1 million souls, and is surrounded by water, so I went equipped with malaria tablets and insect repellent, and believe me, they were needed. And yet, in spite of the personal discomfort, I found the city to be charming, colourful, fascinating. We were warned that there was always a chance of trouble with a huge number of refugees entering the country just to the north of us, and because Somali pirates were operating along the coast, kidnapping and hijacking were real threats. We noticed that there were armed guards outside our hotel, and also guards on every floor inside the hotel. The Kalashnikov rifles were a dead give-away. I still managed to take a tuk-tuk into the old part of Mombasa though, and with my old friend Torsten Brinda, where we wandered around virtually unmolested, taking in the sights, sounds and aromas of authentic Mombasa. The experience of Kenya was made deeply poignant for me when I talked to these young people (pictured) outside some school gates during one of our visits. Some of them are too young to go to school, so they hang around outside gazing in each day, waiting for the time when they will be able to go to school to hopefully better their own lives and those of their families. Full story in Out of Africa.

4. Dublin, Ireland. I had the privilege of visiting the fair city of Dublin twice in 2011, the first time to keynote the 14th Irish National IT Training Conference in April, and the second time in June to speak at the Annual EDEN Conference. On both occasions, I met President Mary McAleese, and got to shake her hand. Ireland is a great country (I have Irish ancestory which helps) and Dublin is a fun city to spend some time in, especially when it's with my old friends Graham Attwell, Deborah Arnold, Philip Wilkinson-Blake, Mark Brown, Eileen Brennan-Freeman and Sally Reynolds, and new friends including Eamon McAteer and John Heffernan. Both trips to Dublin were memorable, not just because of the great experiences of attending two major conferences, but also because of the welcome the city gives, and here's a tip: Temple Bar and the Guinness Factory are a must for any visitors to the city. Full story in Feel the burn and EDEN comes of age.

3. Barcelona, Spain. I always enjoy my visits to Barcelona. It is quite simply one of the most attractive cities you can imagine and in terms of its eclectic and outrageous architecture, it is second to none. The influence of Gaudi, Picasso, Miro and a host of other avant garde artists is evident wherever you turn, and the opportunities to sample the culture and atmosphere of this iconic city are endless. On this occasion, in October, with the weather mild and bearable (I was last in Barcelona in July 2010 when the temperature was extreme) I was invited to keynote the Open University of Barcelona's 8th international conference on teacher training. I had the pleasure of meeting and spending time with Doug Thomas, who with John Seely-Brown, co-authored the book 'A new culture of learning', and also had dinner with legendary author Manuel Castells. It was wonderful talking to these great thinkers, and hoping that at least some of their wisdom and intelligence might rub off on to me! Full story in Slightly dangerous and In the same boat.

2. Wellington, New Zealand. This was my first visit to New Zealand's capital city, 'the coolest little capital in the world,' courtesy of Massey University's Mark Brown. I was invited by Mark to keynote two conferences for the university, and then to stay over in Wellington for the weekend before providing the international keynote for the Tertiary Education Summit. During the weekend I met up with old friends Jo Fothergill and Jedd Bartlett and met Karen Melhuish for the first time down at the offices of Core Ed. Wellington is packed full of things to do and places to see, including the spectacular harbour, Mount Victoria, and of course the Wellywood movie industry scene (Miramar district is where the famous Weta Workshop is located). Going on the Movie tour and visiting some of the location sites for the filming of the Lord of the Rings trilogy was one of the most memorable experiences of my time in New Zealand. In doing so I reflected on the art of film making to the extent that I eventually wrote this piece on attention to detail. I was also delighted to meet Dermot Donnelly on the tour, and I hope to keep in touch with him, given that we are both deeply involved in research into social media in teacher education. The national museum at Te Papa was just across the road from my hotel, so I spent a fun afternoon in there soaking up the kiwi culture and learning more about the history of the islands. Full story of my New Zealand lecture tour in Aotearoa.

1. Melbourne, Australia. This year, the city that has left the best impression has to be Melbourne. I really don't have enough room here to do justice to the seven days I spent in this cosmopolitan, wonderfully laid-back Australian city. Hooking up again with old friends John Sandler, Colin Warren and Joyce Seitzinger really helped to cement my welcome, and meeting new friends such as Mark Smithers and Dave Cummings added to the sheer enjoyment of the city. I was in town to keynote the inaugural technology for teaching and learning summit at the famous Rendezvous hotel, and was glad to share the spotlight with AUT's Thomas Cochrane with whom I spent some down time chatting about mobile learning and life in general. Thanks to all who looked after me so well in #Melb - it was a great pleasure, and very comforting to be in the company of such good friends, so far away from home. My time in Melbourne reached its zenith in a great tweetup gathering down on the riverside underneath St Kilda Bridge where Stephen Heppell and Claire Brooks joined us for drinks, and I was delighted to spend some time talking to Shelley Gibb, Jenny Ashby and Pam Kamande. The Melbourne skyline at night is spectacular, as under floodlights is the iconic Flinders Street Railway station. There is much to see and do in Melbourne; Victoria Market is bustling and colourful, the sporting scene is well represented with multiple world class stadia (including the MCG and Rod Laver Arena) on the edge of the city, and I spent an excellent day out with Joyce and Mark at the Victorian State Museum, learning much about the history of science fiction film making. Full story in The Melbourne set.

Creative Commons Licence
More great places, awesome people by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


December 26, 2011

Great places, awesome people

I was fortunate this year to be invited to speak at major events in some of the most beautiful cities in the world. Although I hate the travel, I have to admit that when I am in such places, and while I am meeting such brilliant and inspirational people, I am in my element. Here is the first part of my end of year retrospective on the top ten (actually eleven) places I visited in 2011, and the great people I met. Today's post goes from 10 down to 6. (Continues tomorrow).


10 =. Newcastle, England. I had an absolute blast in the North East in June. Newcastle is a city I'm quite familiar with from many day excursions with my wife and family over the years (Her parents live in Washington, Tyne and Wear). On this occasion, I was delighted to be invited to keynote the Northern Grid for Learning Annual Conference, and what an event it was! For a start, I flew up in the company of Mr Chickenman himself, Dan Roberts, and when the two of us invaded the executive lounge in the hotel, they quickly ran out of pretzels (Dan's doing, not mine I hasten to add). The speaker list read like a who's who of innovative educators from across the UK. It was wonderful to meet face to face some of the people whom I have followed on Twitter for some time, including Bill Lord, Ian Usher, Steve Bunce, Martin Waller, Ian Addison, Lisa StevensJoe Dale, Bev Evans and Jan Webb. Conference organiser Simon Finch and his team did an excellent job putting together what turned out to be a memorable, inspirational day, and the evening social post event at a Spanish tapas bar on the banks of the Tyne was the icing on the cake. Full story here: It's grins up north.

10 =. Liverpool, England. In March I attended the JISC annual conference in Liverpool, for once purely as a delegate rather than as a speaker. It was a nice change for me, not having to worry about preparing a talk or trying desperately to find my speaking venue. I stayed in a hotel just across the road from the Liverpool Echo Arena where the conference took place, within the beautifully rebuilt and repurposed Albert Dock quayside. In the distance I could see the iconic (new) Liverpool Cathedral on the skyline. I was delighted to discover that I was staying no more than 100 yards from the famous Beatles museum, so I spent a very enjoyable afternoon wandering around looking at all the exhibits, and reliving some of my younger days listening to the Fab Four. Full story here: The next ten years.


9. Auckland, New Zealand. I was in New Zealand in November/December on my lecture tour. While in Auckland I keynoted the International Conference on e-Learning Futures at Unitec. This was my second visit to the City of Sails, but I will never tire of Skycity and the waterfronts of this great city, and in such a stunningly beautiful country. Probably my peak experience of my entire four week tour of the Antipodes was my welcome by the New Zealanders and my invitation to speak in the carved wood meeting hall of the Maori people - the Marae. It was also great to meet up again at the conference with several old friends such as Thomas Cochrane, Noeline Wright, Nigel Robertson, Derek Wenmoth and Richard Elliot, and also to make some new friends including Mandy Williams, Agnes Kukulska-Hulme, Vasi Doncheva and of course ICELF organiser Linda Keesing Styles. Full story here: Barefoot keynote.

8. Karlsruhe, Germany. I arrived on a snowy February evening in Frankfurt and took the train across the Karlsruhe - a town I had first heard of when the invitation to keynote at LearnTEC came through. I admit I had to go to Google Maps to find it. LearnTEC is one of those German Mega-conferences and expos, regularly attracting in excess of 8000 delegates each year. Karlsruhe is a sleepy little town, and in the grey overcast light of a German winter wasn't that impressive. At night however, with all the blue, yellow and red shop and hotel lights glowing and reflecting off the snow, it was magical. I had the pleasure of meeting and spending some time with Conrad Wolfram (also keynoting the event) in the huge Karlsruhe Messe Expo Hall, and also got to spent an enjoyable hour in conversation with him on the journey back from Karlsruhe to Frankfurt International airport. We talked a lot about the future of the Internet and his own research into the development of Answer Engines. He gave me some great insights into the Silicon Valley set and his friendships with the likes of Steve Jobs, Bill Gates and Theodore Gray. Full story here: Interview with a Wolfram.

7. Lisbon, Portugal. It was a pleasant surprise to be invited to keynote not one, but two conferences in Portugal this year. What was even better, was that they were back to back and in the same area of beautiful Oeiras, near Lisbon (this is a picture I took of the Palace of the Marquis de Pombal, the venue we met in). I first visited Lisbon in 2008 when I attended the EDEN Annual Conference and picked up a Fellowship award. It is a beautiful city - the kind that glistens in the sun, captivating your senses wherever you go within in. I spoke at the Concede Conference and then keynoted the final day of the EFQUEL Innovation forum. Many of the great and the good from the world of European e-Learning were present, including Grainne Conole, Chahira Nouira, Deborah Arnold, Alastair Creelman, EDEN President Morten Paulsen and Ulf Daniel Ehlers. I also had the distinct pleasure of meeting up with prolific Twitter activist Paulo Simoes for the first time, and also spent some time with charismatic OER guru Wayne Mackintosh. Full story here: Grand Residence and Wayne's World.


6. Cologne, Germany. I first visited Cologne on a school trip when I was 15 years old, and don't remember too much about the city. This time, I was in town in September to keynote the Zukunft Personal HR Expo, another mega-sized German conference. Cologne is a wonderful place to spend a few days, with its soaring gothic Cathedral, many  bridges crossing the river Rhine, picturesque cosmopolitan streets and marvellous bierkellers and wateringholes. Several of the medieval city gates still stand, despite the pounding Cologne took during the Second World War, and I stayed very close to one of the most spectacular - Rudolfplatz. It is a city that oozes art and culture, and it is not difficult to see why it has become one of the premier German convention centres. The convention hall itself is massive, and it took me some time to navigate around it, before I eventually found the conference hall I was looking for (they host many events simultaneously). It was a pleasant surprise to bump into fellow speaker Laura Overton in the street outside the hotel, and later to meet up again with old friends such as Armin Hopp and Wilfred Rubens at the conference. The tram rides and practicing my German in conversation with the locals were also great fun. Full story here: Business games and Sharp practice.

More great places and awesome people next time.


Creative Commons Licence
Great places, awesome people by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


December 22, 2011

Going viral

Many bloggers would give their right arm to be able to write posts that are widely read. In a painfully truthful Winston Churchill parody, Katie Hafner recently declared that 'never has so much been written by so many, to be read by so few.' For many, blogging is a little like whistling into the wind. It's quite a lonely existence when you write, and write and post your ideas .... but no-one ever reads it. It has to be acknowledged that many bloggers write more for their own benefit than they do as public performance. For them, it is an online diary of their thoughts, exploits and musings which can be eavesdropped on by anyone who happens to be passing by. If someone takes the time to comment, it is a bonus. 


For many other bloggers, this isn't enough, and they write for an intended audience, hoping their posts will be read by a lot of people. It can be soul destroying when it appears that no-one is reading your finely crafted blog post. The metrics of success for most bloggers are the number of views, likes and favourites a post attracts. Then there is the pure gold dust of comments.  Added bonuses can be realised when fellow bloggers think your content is good enough to syndicate on their own sites, or when they translate it into another language or otherwise repurpose it before representing it on their own sites. This results in an amplification of your ideas, but usually, it won't happen unless you license your content for free sharing and repurposing (see my Creative Commons licence at the bottom of this post). 


The ultimate for many aspiring bloggers though is if one of their posts to 'goes viral'. Now, this is a much vaunted and often spoken term on the Web, but do we actually know what it means, or what the causes are of content that goes viral? Viral content is content that becomes quickly popular when it is shared by many across social media platforms. Viral videos on YouTube have included LOLcats, the Numa Numa song (with more than 17 million hits, this video made Gary Brolsma into an Internet star virtually overnight), the Star Wars Kid (> 24 million hits), Charlie Bit Me (close to 400 million views), and on the more serious side, Mike Wesch's videos on internet culture such as 'The Machine is Us/ing Us' (Over 11 million views) Such content takes on a life of its own, and in Web parlance becomes a 'meme'. If a video has a strong message, or is amusing or in some way breaks the mould, it is easy to see how it can attract so many views in such a relatively short period of time. All of the above videos had one or both of those characteristics. More importantly, viral content has the capability to spread the influence of its contained message widely across the community. Many corporations and large organisations have spent a considerable amount of resources and effort trying to replicate the success of such viral content to promote their products. Viral marketing is the holy grail of advertising.

So exactly what does it take for content to go viral? The advice from one website is that content has to exhibit 3 characteristics to go viral. The content has to solve a problem, create interest and er... have 'interesting stuff' contained within it. Even if we merge the last two together (they are that similar), it's a bit of a no-brainer to see that any content that solves and problem and piques interest is going to be attractive to visitors. Other commentators swear that plug-ins and other software is the secret to viral content. Some more sensibly suggest that it is persistence and a cultivating of fine writing abilities, that over a period of time, will enable the blogger to be in a position to write content that has the potential to go viral.

I think the secret of viral content can be a lot more prosaic than this though. One of my recent posts entitled 'Fire and Brimstone' has since it was written in September attracted over 33,000 views. I don't think it is a particularly significant post, and although it deals with a mildly controversial subject (attitudes about the value of blogging) it is nothing special. It is certainly not in my estimation, worthy of consistently attracting over 10,000 views each calendar month. The secret to its success I believe, lies in the image I used (I always include an evocative image at the top of each of my blog posts) - which I have included on this page. The image is a free stock image of fire. Tracking back through all the blog traffic I receive on the Fire and Brimstone post, I can see that most arrive after searching for 'fire' on Google. Clicking one of the images on the search results will take you directly to my blog post. I'm not sure how it has happened, but this I believe, is the reason I receive so much traffic on that single blog post. It's all about the image. Below, you may also see the link to my blogpost in the top ten Google search results, depending on where you are searching from in the world.

As a result of this image, the blog post has, in a small way, gone viral. It's none of my doing, other than the fact that I chose an evocative image which has since become associated with my blog and then been linked to it. The key message is, that although you cannot ensure that any content you create and share will be widely read, there are occasions when, through persistence, and through being in the right place at the right time, you can give your content a great chance of success.

Image source


Creative Commons Licence
Going viral by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


December 20, 2011

Building the future


Like any other part of the training and skills sector, the construction industry depends upon the reliable and effective training of well qualified and competent individuals. Training is rigorous and comprehensive, because if a builder gets it wrong, the consequences can be catastrophic. At Unitec, in Auckland, New Zealand, they train construction workers in all the trades, but there seems to be a particular demand for skilled carpenters in the Land of the Long White Cloud. You see, almost every house in New Zealand is constructed predominantly of wood.

The construction training team Unitec (pictured) are particularly savvy and ahead of the field when it comes to the application of learning technology. During a break in the proceedings at the ICELF event I had the privilege of being shown around their training compound where Unitec delivers its Certificate in Applied Technology (Carpentry). What I saw impressed me.

The Smart Shed is one of the centre pieces of Unitec's technological advance. Situated at the edge of the construction zone, the smart shed looks like any other wooden shed, but inside it is bristling with digital technology. It has full wifi connectivity and web enabled desktop personal computers within. A roller blind on the outside of the shed is pulled up to reveal a multi-gesture interactive whiteboard and short-throw projector. Using these tools, on site demonstrations and interactive learning sessions can be conducted, a few footsteps away from the construction training site.

But it is the QR tag system that is perhaps the most radical departure from traditional on-site construction training. On many of the working surfaces of the houses under construction on site (every one is sold before it is started and later transported on completion to its final destination), QR tags are stapled to the walls. At the appropriate point in their training, holding up their smart phones, students capture the appropriate QR image, which takes them directly to relevant websites that explain building techniques, safety procedures or specialist tool use.

In conversation with the lecturers who instigated this scheme, I asked how long it would take for the construction industry to adopt such leading edge practices for on the job training. 'We don't think it will be long', they replied. 'As soon as these students are qualified, they will be working in the construction industry', they explained. 'It is only a matter of time before they become lead builders, and eventually business owners within the industry. Then they will introduce similar technology supported training for their employees on site'.

Application of new technology that supports learning within authentic contexts. This is situated learning at its best, but is it the future of construction training?


Creative Commons Licence
Building the future by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


December 19, 2011

Play the ball, not the man

I read Wikipedia founder Larry Sanger's blog with interest this week. In response to my post Content as Curriculum? he had written a protracted and elaborate response. Although I was gratified that someone with such a standing in the academic community had taken the time to read my post and respond so comprehensively, I admit I was also a little disconcerted to find that not only had he misapprehended my original message, but had also apparently resorted to name-calling. Now, anyone who knows me reasonably well will understand what drives me to blog. It is to provoke discussion, to agitate, and to disrupt, with the long term goal to hopefully improve aspects of education and training. Sometimes I deliberately take a strong position to achieve this. Readers will disagree or agree with me - see for example this response from another blogger - and we all learn. I am open to criticism and my ideas, theories and contributions are there to be shot at, or built upon. But for Sanger to label me as an 'anti-intellectual' on the basis of the reading of one of my blog posts seemed somewhat reactionary. I'm not convinced there should be a place for this kind of tactic in reasonable discourse. Unfortunately, his stance serves to detract from the otherwise serious debate that I tried to instigate around the current state of curricula in schools. Before anyone else treats my ideas with similar disdain, let me clarify a few points about that blog post.

Firstly, let me deal with the misapprehension: Larry Sanger seems an intelligent, eloquent man, and if you can steer around his personal references, his response analyses my post almost line for line and he has produced some interesting commentary to counter my views. It is a useful contribution to the debate, and is exactly the kind of dialogue I wish to promote. It is the reason I continue to blog provocatively. I won't attempt to respond to him verse by verse as he has done, but I will make some key points. In my post I held that schools need reform, and at the heart of that reform should be an overhaul of the curriculum. For some time now, many highly respected commentators (see for example Stephen Heppell and Sir Ken Robinson) have argued that the majority of school experiences are still organised around old industrialised models. Many have called for a radical change in the way schooling is conducted to improve the chances of young people when they leave school. In my post I suggested that a possible way forward would require a reappraisal of the current curricula, with more emphasis on competencies and literacies. I wish to make something clear: My remark that some knowledge was susceptible to obsolescence was not a call for all knowledge to be removed from curricula - that would indeed be ridiculous. I am not attacking knowledge, as Sanger asserts. Rather, I am calling for schools to re-examine the content of curricula and to find ways to situate this knowledge within more open, relevant and dynamic learning contexts. I am also calling for more of an emphasis on the development of skills that will prepare children to cope better in uncertain futures. It was probably an error to use poor illustrations and analogies to underpin this call. Regardless of any argument thrown against it however, the call still stands, and I am not the first to make it. John Seely-Brown and Doug Thomas (2011) have argued that the majority of school experiences are mechanistic and need to be better contextualised. Regarding current school practices they state: 'The goal is to learn as much as you can, as fast as you can. In this teaching based approach, standardization is a reasonable way to do this, and testing is a reasonable way to measure the result. The processes that necessarily occur to reach the goal therefore, are considered of little consequence in and of themselves. They are valued only for the results they provide'. (p 35). Clearly, this situation is far from ideal. Teachers are pressurised to deliver an over-stuffed, content-laden curriculum in the limited time available, which leaves little time for experimentation and play, conversation or self discovery.

I also called for an end to the compartmentalisation of subjects within the curriculum. Studying a subject in isolation from other subjects suggests to children that there are no connections, as surely as using computers only in an ICT suite suggests that there are only some conditions within which the use of computers can be conducted. Again, context is required, and as Gerver argues: 'learning should be an expansive, personal and unpredictive journey' (p 62). Yet how can we achieve this, he asks, when school becomes an increasingly defined, predictable series of divorced lessons. How can we maintain the interests of children when they know exactly what is coming next - dull routine? Here lies the argument that context is now king, and content has become a tyrant.

But let's go back to the personal comments. At the heart of Sanger's argument is a concerted attempt to establish that I am an anti-intellectual. He does this on the basis of a belief that I am calling for an end to knowledge. But his belief is misfounded, and I have attempted to offer clarification in my recent blog post Conversation as Curriculum. He admits in a previous comment that he was confrontational and pointed. It seems a contradiction that he can view me as a 'serious theorist' and then spend the majority of his post trying to convince his readers that I am 'anti-intellectual'. Surely the two cannot be compatible? His descent into hectoring tones of name-calling detract significantly from his otherwise reasonable arguments. Larry Sanger and I have never met, so we don't know each other. How then is he able make such sweeping judgements about me on the basis of the reading of one of my posts? The answer is, he can't, and I would not presume to reciprocate. To label me as 'anti-intellectual' suggests that he has already made his mind up, and no amount of argument will change that.

I am sure that my academic achievements come nowhere near to Larry Sanger's. My list of peer reviewed publications and the frequency of my invited speeches around the world will not compare with his. Considering my track record, however, I feel that I deserve a little better than to be ridiculed as 'anti-intellectual', and it is ironic that Larry Sanger's act of ridiculing could itself be construed as anti-intellectualism. If by anti-intellectual he meant that I oppose the ivory tower mentality endemic within academia, then I would gladly accept the title, and he might also consider inserting 'dangerous' as a prefix. Sadly, this is not what Sanger intends. Instead, the title is meant to suggest that I am against knowledge, and that therefore my arguments must be dismissed because they are merely 'popularist'. Well, he is entitled to his opinions. Just don't be fooled by the rhetoric - examine the evidence yourself and then make your own mind up: Do current school curricula make sense, or should they be changed? Whatever the outcome of this debate, you can name me, but you'll never tame me. I will continue to provoke, cajole and disrupt via this blog, and I welcome all conversations from all comers. Just make sure you play the ball, not the man.

References 

Gerver, R. (2010) Creating tomorrow's schools today: Education - our children - their futures. London: Continuum.
Seely-Brown, J. and Thomas, D. (2011) A new culture of learning: Cultivating the imagination for a world of constant change. Create Space.

Image by John Garghan


Creative Commons Licence
Play the ball, not the man by Steve Wheeler is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License.


<< Back Next >>