Dear Teachers
(and those who support teachers, please listen in),
I will buy your class $100 worth of books, and donate whatever anyone else pledges below (more on that in a bit), if you successfully execute the following. (I can do this for only one teacher. But if more people pledge money for other teachers to use the program, then…)
(a) Set up your classroom so that you can spend about 25 minutes per day showing ReadingBear.org presentations and then a class quiz. The quiz (done by the class as a whole) should usually be over the day’s words, but occasionally it should be a “big” quiz, over the previous five days’ words.
(b) Do this every day for 16 weeks (I’ll forgive a few days off), or if you want to show Reading Bear for less time, until your class has finished going through the material and most students can get 13/15 on the last quiz on the page, over all the words. (Note, the last is required only if you stop short of 16 weeks.) Make sure you are logged in as you show this to your class. A schedule would go something like this:
Week 1: “short a” (3 days); begin “short e” (2 days)
Week 2: finish “short e” (1 day); “short i” (2 days); “short o” (1 day)
Week 3: “short o” (1 day); and “short u” (2 days); two reviews and big quizzes
Week 4: another review and big quiz; “c and k”; “ck” (both 2 days)
Week 5: blends 1 and blends 2 (1 day each); adding s (2 days); review and big quiz
Week 6: now you switch to 1 presentation per day; “digraphs and x” to “two syllables”
Week 7: review and big quiz; then “long e” through “or”
Week 8: “er, ur, ir”; review and big quiz; then “oy, oi” through “aw, au, al”
Week 9: “ai” and “ay, air”; review and big quiz; “y, ie, ind, ild” and “o, oa, oe”
Week 10: “old, olt, ow” to “2 & 3 syllables”; review and big quiz; “a_e and “e_e”
Week 11: “i_e” to “ing”; review and big quiz
Week 12: “y and more” to “ge, dge, etc.”
Week 13: review and big quiz; “the, se, etc.” to “ph, gh”
Week 14: “ea and ear”; review and big quiz; “ie, ui, u” to “si, su, ci, ti, tu”
Week 15: “ive, or, ence” and “3 & 4 syllables”; then review and big quiz
Note: it doesn’t matter if you spend more time on the early stages, and you only get halfway through the presentations in 16 weeks, as long as you look at at an entire presentation, or an entire review, every day. And also note: I don’t care if your students can’t pass many of the quizzes by the end of that time, as long as you stick with the program for 16 full weeks. I think they will be able to, but we’ll see, now won’t we?
(c) You may show the screen to your whole class at once or, if you have the computers, you can have the students look at the presentations individually (which is actually better, but not required).
(d) Send the kids home with the ReadingBear.org URL and the instructions to review the lesson at home each day, preferably (but not necessarily) until they get at least a 13/15 on the quiz.
(e) You have to agree to answer some questions from me, honestly and accurately, about how you used the program and how well your students are reading at the end of it.
So here’s the deal: I really believe in phonics. In particular, I believe in the Rudolf Flesch method, which I used with both of my boys, who learned to read using this method when they were 1 year old. (My 2-year-old is now decoding at a third grade level, according to this–I’m not kidding.) And in even more particular, I believe in the Reading Bear program. I think we need some evidence that 21st century tools, like Reading Bear, can be used to quickly and easily teach kids how to read. (By “read” I mean to decode text, of course–the hardest part of starting to read–although Reading Bear teaches an awful lot of vocabulary.) I think kids can learn phonics quickly and easily using the right tools. I think that there is no reason why our poor first graders should be made to suffer through those awful, boring basal readers for three or four years. Ugh! They should be reading easy, grade-appropriate, transitional chapter books like My Father’s Dragon and The Magic Tree House. So, teachers, won’t you take a half hour out of your school day next year and help me (a) teach your kids to read, and (b) prove that your typical school kids can be taught to read in four months using Reading Bear? I really think they can be.
I doubt $100 in books is enough to motivate anybody who is not already motivated. But it is a way to get your attention, to commit publicly to a program, etc. And besides…others might kick in more. Maybe we’ll make the prize “stone soup”…
Note for non-teachers: do want to support this effort? Pledge, in the comments below, money for teachers. $100 would be nice. More would be awesome. It’s all unorganized by any organization at this time. I will personally provide an escrow service (you’ll have to trust me!). I’m just doing this because I have something to prove personally…I don’t own the website (the Community Foundation does) and I don’t even operate it, I’ve moved on to Infobitt.com full time. I just want to prove that Reading Bear works. The real winners will be the kids, who learn to read quickly and painlessly (Reading Bear is fun!).
Available money will be split up as follows: $100 per teacher who successfully completes the program, based on the teachers who sign up first below and the available money. If there is more than $100 per teacher available, then all available money will be divided equally among all teachers who finish. To prove their bona fides I must be given the teacher’s Reading Bear login ID. My interpretation of this policy will be final!
Dear Teachers
(and those who support teachers, please listen in),
I will buy your class $100 worth of books, and donate whatever anyone else pledges below (more on that in a bit), if you successfully execute the following. (I can do this for only one teacher. But if more people pledge money for other teachers to use the program, then…)
(a) Set up your classroom so that you can spend about 25 minutes per day showing ReadingBear.org presentations and then a class quiz. The quiz (done by the class as a whole) should usually be over the day’s words, but occasionally it should be a “big” quiz, over the previous five days’ words.
(b) Do this every day for 16 weeks (I’ll forgive a few days off), or if you want to show Reading Bear for less time, until your class has finished going through the material and most students can get 13/15 on the last quiz on the page, over all the words. (Note, the last is required only if you stop short of 16 weeks.) Make sure you are logged in as you show this to your class. A schedule would go something like this:
Week 1: “short a” (3 days); begin “short e” (2 days)
Week 2: finish “short e” (1 day); “short i” (2 days); “short o” (1 day)
Week 3: “short o” (1 day); and “short u” (2 days); two reviews and big quizzes
Week 4: another review and big quiz; “c and k”; “ck” (both 2 days)
Week 5: blends 1 and blends 2 (1 day each); adding s (2 days); review and big quiz
Week 6: now you switch to 1 presentation per day; “digraphs and x” to “two syllables”
Week 7: review and big quiz; then “long e” through “or”
Week 8: “er, ur, ir”; review and big quiz; then “oy, oi” through “aw, au, al”
Week 9: “ai” and “ay, air”; review and big quiz; “y, ie, ind, ild” and “o, oa, oe”
Week 10: “old, olt, ow” to “2 & 3 syllables”; review and big quiz; “a_e and “e_e”
Week 11: “i_e” to “ing”; review and big quiz
Week 12: “y and more” to “ge, dge, etc.”
Week 13: review and big quiz; “the, se, etc.” to “ph, gh”
Week 14: “ea and ear”; review and big quiz; “ie, ui, u” to “si, su, ci, ti, tu”
Week 15: “ive, or, ence” and “3 & 4 syllables”; then review and big quiz
Note: it doesn’t matter if you spend more time on the early stages, and you only get halfway through the presentations in 16 weeks, as long as you look at at an entire presentation, or an entire review, every day. And also note: I don’t care if your students can’t pass many of the quizzes by the end of that time, as long as you stick with the program for 16 full weeks. I think they will be able to, but we’ll see, now won’t we?
(c) You may show the screen to your whole class at once or, if you have the computers, you can have the students look at the presentations individually (which is actually better, but not required).
(d) Send the kids home with the ReadingBear.org URL and the instructions to review the lesson at home each day, preferably (but not necessarily) until they get at least a 13/15 on the quiz.
(e) You have to agree to answer some questions from me, honestly and accurately, about how you used the program and how well your students are reading at the end of it.
So here’s the deal: I really believe in phonics. In particular, I believe in the Rudolf Flesch method, which I used with both of my boys, who learned to read using this method when they were 1 year old. (My 2-year-old is now decoding at a third grade level, according to this–I’m not kidding.) And in even more particular, I believe in the Reading Bear program. I think we need some evidence that 21st century tools, like Reading Bear, can be used to quickly and easily teach kids how to read. (By “read” I mean to decode text, of course–the hardest part of starting to read–although Reading Bear teaches an awful lot of vocabulary.) I think kids can learn phonics quickly and easily using the right tools. I think that there is no reason why our poor first graders should be made to suffer through those awful, boring basal readers for three or four years. Ugh! They should be reading easy, grade-appropriate, transitional chapter books like My Father’s Dragon and The Magic Tree House. So, teachers, won’t you take a half hour out of your school day next year and help me (a) teach your kids to read, and (b) prove that your typical school kids can be taught to read in four months using Reading Bear? I really think they can be.
I doubt $100 in books is enough to motivate anybody who is not already motivated. But it is a way to get your attention, to commit publicly to a program, etc. And besides…others might kick in more. Maybe we’ll make the prize “stone soup”…
Note for non-teachers: do want to support this effort? Pledge, in the comments below, money for teachers. $100 would be nice. More would be awesome. It’s all unorganized by any organization at this time. I will personally provide an escrow service (you’ll have to trust me!). I’m just doing this because I have something to prove personally…I don’t own the website (the Community Foundation does) and I don’t even operate it, I’ve moved on to Infobitt.com full time. I just want to prove that Reading Bear works. The real winners will be the kids, who learn to read quickly and painlessly (Reading Bear is fun!).
Available money will be split up as follows: $100 per teacher who successfully completes the program, based on the teachers who sign up first below and the available money. If there is more than $100 per teacher available, then all available money will be divided equally among all teachers who finish. To prove their bona fides I must be given the teacher’s Reading Bear login ID. My interpretation of this policy will be final!
Students who attend school in the rural communities and small towns of five Southern states suffer the lion’s share of all corporal punishment that takes place in the nation’s public schools; and it is in these small towns and rural communities where corporal punishment must be vigorously attacked.
via TCRecord
We conclude this special issue reflecting back on the history of desegregation and questioning how we move forward in trying to achieve racially integrated school settings. The epilogue includes a conversation with Dr. Michael A. Middleton, Deputy Chancellor of the University of Missouri-Columbia. Dr. Middleton is an expert in civil rights and employment discrimination and served as the lead counsel for plaintiffs in the St. Louis metropolitan school desegregation litigation. Dr. Middleton discusses the history, current status, and future of school desegregation.
via TCRecord
The authors introduce sports counseling as a close and newly discovered younger relative of sport psychology. They explore the evolution of sport counseling services and how these services may differ from more mainstream and psychology. They point out the differences and similarities of services that sport psychology and counseling provide and how both are critical to athletes.
via TCRecord
On January 29, 2008 the Toronto District School Board (TDSB) approved the development of an Africentric school under their Alternative School policy. Calls for Black-focused schools also arose in 2008 in London in response to the rise in gang violence and the disengagement of African Caribbean youth. This comparative paper analyzes the historical development of Black-focused education in Toronto and London from 1968 - 2008 as a response by Black parents and community activists to the historic underachievement of African Caribbean students (particularly males) in the public schools of both cities. I situate the development of Black-focused education in each city within the larger social, political, and national policy contexts, trace critical incidents that fueled the development of race-based school district policy, and explore how the “politics of place” has influenced the trajectory of Black-focused education in each city. The historiography of Black education has largely focused on the US educational system. Research on educational reform efforts such as Afrocentric schooling has also reflected this US-centric focus. This comparative study reconceptualizes Black-focused schooling within the context of the African Diaspora by examining how advocacy for an African-centered curriculum and ideology was adapted to local conditions in Canada and Britain.
via TCRecord
This article explores the dilemmas created by between-district segregation and school district fragmentation in terms of efforts to diversify schools. We first review existing research to examine what is known empirically about between-district segregation, and the role of school district fragmentation as a contributing factor. We then examine policy efforts to address problems caused by fragmentation in other (non-educational) domains, and we consider whether such efforts could serve as a potential solution to school district fragmentation. We conclude with educational policy lessons based upon our examination of these prior efforts both within and outside of education to inform the current policy debate around school segregation.
via TCRecord
If structured equitably racially diverse schools can offer all students better opportunities, however, the benefits of racial diversity are undermined if subsequent policies, systems, and practices are not in place to ensure that all students are equitably given opportunities to learn. This article further problematizes the concept of “diversity” by exploring how one racially mixed high school’s vision for diversity was mismatched with the reality of apparent inequities within the school. Students of color who transferred to the high school for better opportunities were ultimately resegregated to racially isolating structures. The study’s findings align with scholars who call for further critique of what it means to be truly diverse or integrated, and suggest currently policies designed to achieve diverse schooling fail to chisel at mechanisms that inevitably sustain the inequitable racial and social order within schools.
via TCRecord
This article describes the events surrounding the Kelly v. Mason (1968) case, which led to Las Vegas’ mandatory school desegregation plan and the African American community’s request in 1992 to abandon the mandatory busing plan for a return to neighborhood schools. Its secondary aim is to disrupt a tradition of advocacy for school integration absent the voices, experiences, and in many cases forewarnings of Black community stakeholders who questioned whether school desegregation via forced busing would actually result in equal education and genuine racial integration.
via TCRecord
In many areas, discussion of the Common Core standards has degraded into the talk of conspiracy theorists. This troubling development has overshadowed the very real concerns with implementing the standards that advocates need to address. This article, after dispatching the conspiracy wing-nuttery, outlines several lingering questions regarding the Common Core with the hopes of sparking a more productive discussion of this enormous undertaking.
via TCRecord