Who is most responsible for your online privacy being violated?
You are.
Privacy is one of the biggest concerns in tech news recently. The importance of personal privacy is something everybody seems to be able to agree on. But if you’re concerned about privacy, then you need stop giving your information away willy-nilly. Because you probably are.
Well, maybe you are. See how many of the following best practices you already follow.
How many did you answer “I do that!” to? I scored 22, to be totally honest, but it’ll be up to 27 soon. Answer below. Well, answer only if you have a high score, or if you use a pseudonym. I don’t want hackers to know who they can hit up for an easy win!
If you’re like me, you feel a need to need to kick the tech giants out of your life. But how? Well, nobody said it would be easy, but I’m actually doing it!
Stop using Google Chrome. Google is contemptuous of your privacy and of free speech. I recommend Brave.
Stop using Google Search. And it tracks you after you search. I recommend DuckDuckGo, with results just as good as Google’s 90+% of the time, in my experience.
Stop using Gmail. Look. Gmail is way overrated. And there are many, many other options out there which do not read your mail and extract marketable data.
Stop using Google Contacts and iCloud. Start managing your own contacts and data. There are lots of great tools to do this; it’s not that hard.
Shields up on all the tech giants’ websites and devices. Dive in to the innards of your settings (or options)—not just a few, all of them, because they like to hide things—and set your privacy settings to max.
Maybe quit social media. Facebook, Twitter, YouTube, and others have becoming increasingly censorious and contemptuous of your privacy. Make them less relevant by spending more time elsewhere, if you can’t just quit for good.
Use a password manager. Stop letting your browser track your passwords.
And then, if you want to get serious:
Start learning Linux… Microsoft’s problems with privacy and security are famous. Apple has its own too. Well, there are these things called “virtual machines” which make it easy (and free) to install and play with your very own Linux installation. Try it!
…then switch to Linux. If you know how to use Linux, why not make the switch to something more permanent? You can always dual-boot.
If you’re one of those people who uses the same password for everything, especially if it’s a simple password, you’re a fool and you need to stop. But if you’re going to maintain a zillion different passwords for a zillion different sites, how? Password management software. I’ve been using the free, open source KeePass, which is secure and it works, but it doesn’t integrate well with browsers, or let me save my password date securely in the cloud (or maybe better, on the blockchain). So I’m going to get a better password manager and set it up on all my devices. This is an essential to locking down my cyber-life. One of the ways Facebook, LinkedIn, et al. insinuate themselves in our cyber-lives is by giving us an easy way to log in to other sites. But that makes it easier for them to track us everywhere. Well, if you install a decent password manager, then you don’t have to depend on social login services. Just skip them and use the omnipresent “log in with email” option every time. Your password manager will make it even easier than social login systems did.
Password management software securely holds your passwords and brings them out, also securely, when you’re logging in to websites in your desktop and handheld browsers. Decent browsers (like Brave) make your passwords available for the same purposes, if you let them, but there are strong reasons you shouldn’t rely on your browser to act as a password manager.
Instead, for many years I’ve been using KeyPass, a free (open source) password manager that’s been around for quite a while. The problem with KeyPass, as with a lot of open source software, is that it’s a bit clunky. I never did get it to play nicely with browsers, and your passwords are saved in a file on your computer and/or in the cloud. If you lose the file, you lose your passwords.
Password managers do, of course, automatically generate passwords and save them securely. They can also (but not all do) store your password database securely in the cloud, so you don’t have to worry about losing it (you can export a copy if you like). You can use it on all your devices with equal ease. They’ll let you log in with a fingerprint on your phone.
A very nice feature is that they’ll securely store payment information, so your browser, websites, and operating system don’t have to hold that information. That means you don’t have to trust them to manage this information properly. You only need to trust the password manager…
“Ah,” you say, “but can you trust password managers?” That’s not a bad or naive question at all; it’s an excellent question. Consumer Reports, of all things, weighs in:
By default, LastPass, 1Password, and Dashlane store your password vault on their servers, allowing you to easily sync your data across devices. As a second benefit, if your computer crashes you won’t lose your vault.
But some people just really hate the idea of storing all their passwords on one site in the cloud—no matter what the company promises about its security measures, there’s probably a bulls-eye painted on its encrypted back. If that sounds like you, it’s possible to store your passwords locally.
Dashlane lets you do this by disabling the “Sync” feature in Preferences. This will delete your vault and its contents from the company’s servers. Of course, any further changes you make to your vault on your computer won’t show up on your other devices.
So what’s my take? There are layers upon layers of security protecting your password repository, not least of which is the (hopefully well-chosen) master password to your password database. While you do have to choose the professionalism and honesty of a cloud-based password manager, I think that’s their business, so I’m inclined to trust them. But, but!
I ask myself: what is more likely, that they become compromised (for whatever reason—let your imagination run wild) or instead that I lose my master password or all copies of my password database or somehow allow myself to be hacked? I think both are fairly unlikely, first of all. I am certainly inclined to distrust myself, especially over the long haul. And frankly, the idea that a security business is compromised seems unlikely, since security is their business. But could a password manager server be hacked? That is, again, a really good question, and you wouldn’t be the first to ask it. Password manager company OneLogin was actually hacked, and the hackers could actually “decrypt encrypted data,” the company said. Holy crap!
Also, which is most disastrous? Losing my password file would not be a disaster; I can easily generate new passwords; that’s just a pain, not a disaster. But a hacker getting hold of my passwords in the cloud (no matter how unlikely)? That could be pretty damn bad.
After all, especially as password manager companies grow in size (as successful companies are wont to do), they naturally can be expected to become a honeypot for hackers. Another example of a hacked password management company was LastPass, which was hacked in 2015, although without exposing their users’ passwords.
If you’re like me, you have libertarian concerns about having to trust external entities (and especially, giant corporations) with your entire digital lives. You might also not want to trust (future?) dangerous governments with the power to force those corporations to give access to your entire digital life, then we’re no longer talking about anti-crime cybersecurity. Then it looks like you shouldn’tsensibly put your password files in a corporate-managed cloud. Then you’re having to trust people a little too much for my comfort. So you should manage their location yourself.
Then there are two further problems. First, can you be sure that it is impossible for anyone at the password management software company to crack your password database, even if you host it yourself? (Do they have a copy? Can they get access to a copy? If they have access, are there any back doors?)
Second, there’s the practical issue: Without the cloud, how do you sync your passwords between all your devices? That feature is the main advantage of hosting your passwords in the cloud. So how can you do it automatically, quickly, and easily?
Several password managers use the cloud, but what is stored in the cloud is only the encrypted data. All the login and decryption happens on your local device. This is called zero-knowledge security, and it might be a suitable compromise for many. I have one main issue with this: Especially if the software is proprietary, we must simply trust the company that that is, in fact, how it works. But that’s a lot to ask. So I’ll pass on these. I’ll manage the hosting of my own passwords, thanks very much.
Here are my notes on various password managers:
Dear reader, I went with EnPass.
So how did I get started? Well, the to do list was fairly substantial. I…
I’m now enjoying the new, secure, and easy access to my passwords on all my devices. I’m also happy to be free of browser password managers.
This was installment four in my series on how I’m locking down my cyber-life.
Here’s how I actually set up my own private email hosting—sanger.io! I already finished choosing a private email hosting provider. So what was the next step?
I still had to choose a plan with my chosen provider (InMotion Hosting, which didn’t pay me anything for this) and pay for it. The details are uninteresting; anybody could do this.
Now the hard work (such as it was) began. I…
(1) Read over the domain host’s getting-started guide for email. InMotion’s is here, and if you have a different host, they’re bound to have some instructions as well. If you get confused, their excellent customer service department can hold your hand a lot.
(2) Created a sanger.io email address, since that’s what they said to do first. In case you want to email me, my username is ‘larry’. (Noice and simple, ey?) InMotion let me create an email address, and I was rather confused about how this could possibly work since I hadn’t pointed any DNS, hosted by NameCheap, to InMotion.
(3) Chose one of the domain hosts’s web app options. For a webmail app (InMotion gave me a choice of three), I went with Horde, which is, not surprisingly, a little bit clunky compared to Gmail, but so far not worse than ZohoMail; we’ll see. Unsurprisingly, when I tried to send an email from my old gmail account to my new @sanger.io account, the latter didn’t receive it. Definitely need to do some DNS work first…
(4) Pointed my domain name to the right mail server. In technical jargon, I created an MX record on my DNS host. This was surprisingly simple. I just created an MXE Record on NameCheap, my DNS host for sanger.io, and pointed it to an IP address I found on InMotion. So basically, I just found the right place to paste in the IP address, and it was done. Now I can send and receive email via sanger.io (at least via webmail).
(5) Created email addresses for my other family members. Very easy.
(6) Installed a desktop email client. Why? I wasn’t using one before because I just used Gmail in a browser and Apple’s mail app on my phone. I could keep using webmail (on InMotion) but a desktop client is apt to be nicer. I’d tell you which one I used, but I’m not confident it’s particularly good.
(7) Installed a new email client for my phone. As I no longer trust or want to support Apple if I can at all help it, I wanted to stop using their email client. I paid $10 for a privacy-touting mail client which is quite good so far: Canary Mail.
(8) Change the mail address registered with the big, consequential apps and services. This is the most labor-intensive step, and the step I most dreaded. Sure, it was a pain. But it turns out it was tremendously satisfying to be able to tell them to stop using my wretched Gmail address and instead to start using my slick new permanent and personalized address. Was that fun? Heck yeah it was! Anyway, such apps and services include (click on the links for useful privacy tips):
(9) Create a Gmail forwarder! Buh-bye, Google! No need even to visit your crappy, biased, would-be totalitarian service for email any longer.
(10) Clean up and consolidation. There are a zillion little consequences when you change your email on all these big services, and I expect I’ll be dealing with the consequences (nothing major!) for a few days or weeks to come. Among the things I know I’ll have to do: (a) Install and configure mail clients on my laptop and iPad, and in other ways get those other devices working as expected again. (b) Update various email clients with address book information, as needed. (c) Actually collect my contacts from Google and Apple (harder than it sounds). (d) Change entries in my password manager from @gmail.com to @sanger.io. (e) Actually, get a new password manager…but that’s a whole nuther thang. (f) Get Microsoft and Google and whatever else to forget my contacts…ditto.
This was installment three in my series on how I’m locking down my cyber-life.
I want to lock down my cyber-life. One basic constraint is that I want to replace Gmail, and when I do so, I never want to change my email address again. My biggest concern is that I never again want to be beholden to any major Internet corporation that has shown its contempt for privacy and censorship concerns. But if I can get “the last email address I’ll ever need” while I’m at it, all the better.
The natural solution is to own my own domain name and seek out email hosting. This is not as difficult as it might sound, but it isn’t as easy as registering a new Google account. But then, that is exactly what Google is counting on: your laziness.
My new address will live at the newly-registered sanger.io domain. I and my family members can have unique and easy to remember email addresses for all the rest of our lives. After purchasing sanger.io (from NameCheap), I listed a number of features I knew I wanted: reasonable price, unlimited (or more than I could reasonably need) email storage space, IMAP support, a webmail app built in to the hosting provider (or else software that they make it easy for me to install on my new domain), and finally, enough email addresses for my purposes.
I ended up weeding out a fair few on grounds that they were too expensive (e.g., ProtonMail) or didn’t offer enough storage space or accounts (e.g., NameCheap). I also weeded many out because their Alexa ranking was above 10,000, and while that isn’t a make-or-break deal, I didn’t want to have to deal with a fly-by-night operation and maybe have to move operations again.
| Price | Space limit | IMAP support | Webmail app | # of addresses | Web Hosting Geeks.com rating | Includes web hosting | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BlueHost Plus | $5.95/mo | Unlimited | Yes | Yes | Unlimited | 2.5 | Yes |
| InMotion Hosting | $6.39/mo | Unlimited | Yes | Yes | Unlimited | 4.5 | Yes |
| Rackspace Email | $2/user/mo (so for me, $6/mo) | 25GB/ account | Yes | Yes | 1/$2 account | not reviewed | No |
| Zoho | $3/user/mo (so for me, $9/mo) | 30GB/ account | Yes | Yes | 1/$3 account | not reviewed | No |
I also discovered that some competitive email hosting (in the case of BlueHost and InMotionHosting) comes packaged with shared web hosting, which would be handy. I mean, then I could finally ditch GoDaddy, which I’ve used since time immemorial. (I dislike their upselling and bait-and-switch tactics, and detest their clunky user interface.)
I use Zoho Mail for work, and it’s quite decent, but it costs half again as much and doesn’t bundle shared web hosting. RackSpace email hosting seems high-quality, but it fails by comparison with BlueHost and InMotionHosting, in that those two offer unlimited email addresses and unlimited email storage space. And between the latter two, InMotionHosting seems to be the better reviewed by WebHostingGeeks.com and in other reviews. Besides, it supports Ruby; I could host my Rails projects there.
I looked at a number of other reviews of InMotionHosting, and it does indeed look good. It also has spam protection (which I didn’t think to check on at first), lots of PostgreSQL databases if I want them, and free website data migration from GoDaddy.
I understand that this is not a route that most people will take. Paying for email seems unnecessary, many people would say. And certainly most people don’t need their own domain name for email, they think. But just think: you can have the same, perfectly appropriate email address for the rest of your life. And you no longer have to feel beholden to the privacy practices of an Internet giant like Google.
Look, you don’t have to be an uber-geek to do this. If you can’t do it yourself, and you can get a geeky friend to set this up for you—it’s not that expensive, and then you’d have your own address forever.
And you’d no longer have to support the growing monster that is Google. Gmail is admittedly a pretty awesome web app, but frankly I find I haven’t missed it much when using ZohoMail for work, and I don’t even use the Google email client on my phone. So the slightly slicker quality of the Gmail web app really doesn’t make that much difference after all.
Next: how I set up my new private email hosting.
This was the second installment in my report about how I’m locking down my cyber-life.
My 2019 New Year’s resolution (along with getting into shape, of course) is to lock down my cyber-life. This is for two reasons.
First, threats to Internet security of all sorts have evolved beyond the reckoning of most of us, and if you have been paying attention, you wonder what you should really be doing in response. My phone was recently hacked and my Google ID reset. The threats can come from criminals, ideological foes and people with a vendetta or a mission (of whatever sort), foreign powers, and—of special concern for some of us—the ubiquitous, massively intrusive ministrations of the tech giants.
Second, the Silicon Valley behemoths have decided to move beyond mere moderation for objectively abusive behavior and shutting down (really obvious) terrorist organizations, to start engaging in viewpoint censorship of conservatives and libertarians. As a free speech libertarian who has lived online for much of my life since 1994, these developments are deeply concerning. The culprits include the so-called FAANG companies (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google), but to that list we must add YouTube, Twitter, and Microsoft. Many of us have been saying that we must take ourselves out of the hands of these networks—but exactly how to do so is evidently difficult. Still, I’m motivated to try.
At the root of both problems is simply that the fantastic efficiency and simplicity of computer technology is secured via our participation in networks and EULAs offered by massively rich and powerful corporations. Naturally, because what they offer is so valuable and because it is offered at reasonable prices (often, free), they can demand a great deal of information and control in exchange. This dynamic has led to us (most of us) shipping them boatloads of our data. That’s a honeypot for criminals, authoritarians, and marketers.
There is nothing we can do about it—except to stop participating.
The threat to our privacy undermines some basic principles of the decentralized Internet that blossomed in the 90s and boomed in the 00s. The Establishment has taken over what was once a centerless, mostly privacy-respecting phenomenon of civil society, transforming it into something centralized, invasive, risky, and controlling. What was once the technology of personal autonomy has enabled—as never before—cybercrime, collectivization, mob rule, and censorship.
I don’t propose to try to lead a political fight. I just want to know what I can do personally to mitigate my own risks.
I’m not sure of the complete list of things that I ought to do. I will examine some of these in more depth (in other blog posts, perhaps) before I take action, but others I have already implemented.
What have I left out?
Are you going to join me in this push toward greater privacy and autonomy? Let me know—or, of course, you can keep it to yourself.
My 2019 New Year’s resolution (along with getting into shape, of course) is to lock down my cyber-life. This is for two reasons.
First, threats to Internet security of all sorts have evolved beyond the reckoning of most of us, and if you have been paying attention, you wonder what you should really be doing in response. My phone was recently hacked and my Google ID reset. The threats can come from criminals, ideological foes and people with a vendetta or a mission (of whatever sort), foreign powers, and—of special concern for some of us—the ubiquitous, massively intrusive ministrations of the tech giants.
Second, the Silicon Valley behemoths have decided to move beyond mere moderation for objectively abusive behavior and shutting down (really obvious) terrorist organizations, to start engaging in viewpoint censorship of conservatives and libertarians. As a free speech libertarian who has lived online for much of my life since 1994, these developments are deeply concerning. The culprits include the so-called FAANG companies (Facebook, Apple, Amazon, Netflix, Google), but to that list we must add YouTube, Twitter, and Microsoft. Many of us have been saying that we must take ourselves out of the hands of these networks—but exactly how to do so is evidently difficult. Still, I’m motivated to try.
At the root of both problems is simply that the fantastic efficiency and simplicity of computer technology is secured via our participation in networks and EULAs offered by massively rich and powerful corporations. Naturally, because what they offer is so valuable and because it is offered at reasonable prices (often, free), they can demand a great deal of information and control in exchange. This dynamic has led to us (most of us) shipping them boatloads of our data. That’s a honeypot for criminals, authoritarians, and marketers.
There is nothing we can do about it—except to stop participating. That’s why I want to kick the tech giants out of my life.
The threat to our privacy undermines some basic principles of the decentralized Internet that blossomed in the 90s and boomed in the 00s. The Establishment has taken over what was once a centerless, mostly privacy-respecting phenomenon of civil society, transforming it into something centralized, invasive, risky, and controlling. What was once the technology of personal autonomy has enabled—as never before—cybercrime, collectivization, mob rule, and censorship.
I don’t propose to try to lead a political fight. I just want to know what I can do personally to mitigate my own risks.
I’m not sure of the complete list of things that I ought to do. I will examine some of these in more depth (in other blog posts, perhaps) before I take action, but others I have already implemented.
What have I left out?
Are you going to join me in this push toward greater privacy and autonomy? Let me know—or, of course, you can keep it to yourself.
This study of associate professors at four-year higher education institutions uses national survey data to predict the degree to which associate professors are clear about their prospects of promotion to the rank of full professor.
via TCRecord
This study analyzes historical portrayals of enslavement in 21 recently published books for elementary students. Informed by critical race theory, our findings suggest elementary teachers will be presented with a more complicated set of options when selecting among historical children’s literature than previously documented by researchers.
via TCRecord
Drawing on 47 life history interviews with Division I student-athletes, this paper questions the extent to which college sports offer meritocratic mobility. Findings reveal a sports-track-to-college pipeline and a correspondence between White middle-class communities and greater access to elite universities via athletics.
via TCRecord
This study integrates social capital and social cognitive theories to frame an investigation of the social sources that contribute to teachers’ self-efficacy over time, and explores how social interactions that vary in their relationship with and proximity to instruction influence teachers’ developing self-efficacy.
via TCRecord
In this research, we found that Black PhD students and postdoctoral researchers in engineering and computing departments framed the stress and strain of their STEM doctoral experiences through the lens of race. Their experiences in these settings not only led them to question their abilities and fit within their doctoral programs but also gave them the sense that they had to work twice as hard as their non-Black peers to survive the doctoral program.
via TCRecord
Utilizing a critical discourse analysis framework, this study assesses the language conveyed in university presidents’ responses to racism at several predominantly White institutions and how their responses reveal larger patterns of social power and privilege. By informing the conversation around how those in power respond to racist speech, this research presents several implications for the ways in which universities can be more responsive to marginalized student communities.
via TCRecord
This commentary argues that edTPA should be modified, or replaced, to produce more fair, equitable, and meaningful outcomes among teacher candidates.
via TCRecord
This descriptive phenomenological study explores how 2-year college students participating in STEM classes and programs perceive themselves as learners.
via TCRecord