Log on:
Powered by Elgg

Wayne Barry :: Blog :: Iconclasm in the Digital Age

January 29, 2009

Gee is such an absorbing read and lots of wonderfully quotable nuggets like:

"But all learning is ... learning to play 'the game'. For example, literary criticism and field biology are different 'games' played by different rules. (They are different sorts of activities requiring different values, tools, and ways of acting and thinking; they are different domains with different goals and different 'win states')" p. 7

I have only just finished chapter 2, but I was interested in his notion of "semiotic domains" which he describes as "an area or set of activities where people think, act and value in certain ways" (p. 19). These "semiotic domains" employ a range of modalities (or multimodalities in this case) which would encompass the following:

  • oral or written language
  • images
  • equations
  • symbols
  • sounds
  • gestures
  • graphs
  • artifacts, etc

These modalities are embued with specific meanings which are communicated in very distinctive ways - in some respects I see these as being very similar to the idea of transliteracy which Sue Thomas (of PART) defines as:

" ... the ability to read, write and interact across a range of platforms, tools and media from signing and orality through handwriting, print, TV, radio and film, to digital social networks."

Can you unravel the hidden message?Transliteracy, then, becomes an umbrella term to include the likes of literacy, digital literacy, media literacy, information literacy, visual literacy and computer literacy (to name but a few). The idea of images and symbols that have become to represent real-world objects is as old as neolithic man and used by the ancient Egyptians in the form of hieroglyphics (we can include other cultures that made use of glyphics and pictograms here). It is interesting to see how symbols and imagery has come full circle with the power of the pixel and the ascension of nu-hieroglyphics like semacode and data matrix code which contain information tucked away within those barcode-like symbols and can now be captured and translated by mobile phone technology. What would the cognitive archaeologists make of these symbols in 2000 years time I wonder?

References

Gee, J.P. (2007). What Video Games Have To Teach Us About Learning And Literacy (Revised and Updated Edition). New York, Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.

Keywords: game, hieroglphics, IDGBL2009, literacy, pixels, play, semacode, semiotic domain, transliteracy

Posted by Wayne Barry


Comments

  1. I found Gee stimulating too Wayne - I wanted to extend his analysis to the underlying "games" of teaching.  Thanks for the transliteracy links which I think may be useful for my current thinking about my dissertation.

    Christine 

    Christine SinclairChristine Sinclair on Friday, 30 January 2009, 07:43 GMT # |

  2. In passing I am relieved and reassured to find that at least some are finding Gee a good read.  :-)  I find it very engaging and stimulating, but experiences from earlier instances of the course are that some find it "difficult".  Of course it *is* difficult, but I believe that it is also worth the effort.

    Hamish MacleodHamish Macleod on Friday, 06 February 2009, 13:09 GMT # |

You must be logged in to post a comment.