I made some minor changes to the mind map. Assessment is now fully two-way, it wasn't before. And I have added Twitter and PBwiki to the technologies list.

Some short remarks:

• Like I said, I think I could not have drawn the map this way at the beginning of the course. No idea, what kind of map I would have drawn then.
• The bottom part of the map is heavily influenced by the community of inquiry model.
• I could have added more relations, but tried to concentrate on the most important ones.
• Technologies are relatively isolated, they are really the least interesting part, I think.
• The way library / resources are integrated is consistent with my thinking since about 10 years.
• I have added two web 2.0 principles, re-use of data, and co-design. Co-design is also responsible for the only crossing line in the map, but students cross a teachers' line, which is in its own way rather funny.
• Design and activities stand heavily out as important nodes. These will be interesting candidates for mind maps of their own.
• O yeah, students are the most busy node in the map, also kind of interesting.