Log on:
Powered by Elgg

Nicola Osborne :: Blog

January 20, 2010

I experienced a combination of compulsion and frustration playing Pacman, Donkey Kong, and Frogger.  The compulsion was that I kept going – replaying the game, thinking this time I will get through to the next level.  Frustration was when I nearly made it but not quite.  I also experienced a kind of recklessness when I was close to completing a level – just rushing in to finish it instead of calming down and taking my time to finish.  There is definitely a physiological response – I found myself holding my breath, feeling slightly anxious and the adrenalin pumping around my body.  It was totally immersive but I partly resented this immersiveness.  The resentment is due to feeling that I was ‘wasting my time’ playing these games – although having to experience them for the course did give them a legitimacy for me. 

Newman looks at why do players play. He  cites Rouse’s key motivations: challenge, immersion and the fact that players expect to do, not watch.  Certainly, I have experienced the immersion.  It is interesting what Newman (2004) says about ‘challenge’ – that players expect to lose.  Maybe that is why I find them so frustrating – I don’t expect to lose (but I keep losing).  The pleasure he claims is through replaying and practicing until the performance gets better.  For me these platform games are too simple – in that I find the repetition too boring. Maybe I would enjoy it more if the rewards were more ‘real’ – rather than just getting to the next level.  Although I expect I would get elated if I ever make it to the next level.

 Newman, J. (2004) Chapter 2, 'What is a video game? Rules, Puzzles and Simulation'. In Videogames, London: Routledge.

Posted by Silvana di Gregorio | 2 comment(s)

January 18, 2010

As with Google Docs, are the developers and ROM collators involved in the MAME project acting in the best principles of preserving examples of our fledgling digital games culture? http://mamedev.org/ & http://mameworld.info/

 

 

 

Posted by Hugh O'Donnell | 0 comment(s)

“Mum, you’re not playing a game!”, my eighteen year old daughter exclaimed when she suddenly came into my study.  I quickly showed her my Digital Game-based Learning course book and explained that it was a module for my MSc in E-Learning course.  I think that sums up my starting point with games – playing games is not something associated with me and I am embarrassed to be caught playing a game!  

I was playing PacMan and it was the first time I played that game.  I was successful in getting to Level 2 at my first attempt but I did not realise that when I ate a large sphere and the ghosts turned blue that I could try to ‘eat’ them to earn extra points. I only learned that (and the fact that those things were ghosts) by later googling to find out more about the game. [Note: My getting to stage 2 at my first go was just beginners luck. I found it more difficult subsequently!]

I had a harder time with Donkey Kong.  The up key did not appear to work when I tried to make the man climb the ladder so I decided that I would have to make a number of points jumping over barrels before I could make it to the next level. But that did not seem to work. I got very frustrated and would have given up if I were not on the course. So again I googled ‘Donkey Kong pattern’ and gathered that the man could go up the ladder.  I realised that he had to be positioned exactly in front of the ladder in order to go up it.

Having done some of the initial reading about the definitions of digital or videogames, I realise that I have played some before. In particular, I have played minesweeper on my phone as well as brick???.  And I have played solitaire on my laptop.  I never thought of them as digital games – mainly because I didn’t play with anyone else – they were solitaire games. (And yes, I just used the word ‘game’.)  But I did not go out of my way to get those games – they came with my phone/laptop and I only played them when I was in transit when I was tired of reading.  But I enjoyed playing them (as long as no one I knew saw me playing them!).

Keywords: Donkey_Kong, IDGBL10, Pacman

Posted by Silvana di Gregorio | 1 comment(s)

January 15, 2010

I stumbled on this paper - http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/123238095/abstract - which introduces the concept of uLearning (ubiquitous learning).  I've seen some nifty demonstrations of augmented reality and GPS-enabled phones, and I reflect on the ideas of "location of play" and "public performance" in the Newman paper from Readings Week 1.

Keywords: augmented reality, IDGBL10, mLearning, uLearning

Posted by Hugh O'Donnell | 0 comment(s)

October 02, 2009

A blog is an example of an embodiment of thought which would otherwise most likely exist in it's thinker's head - or those that heard it and thought it worthy of memory space.

Keywords: IDEL09

Posted by Carl Simmons | 2 comment(s)

September 29, 2009

 

Well week 1 is over and we’re into week 2 and the first reflection is how I’ve failed to keep the planned blog, which I know will help me with the studying (I used one in my first module and not in the second and noticed the difference).   I could link this to work being really busy too but that’s just me making excuses so here’s an attempt at encapsulating the starting points for my thinking.

  • The way in which the course is structured to give us (as students) ownership of both content and direction of the course – and what this means we have to recognise as our responsibilities to ensure a successful programme
    • And to a lesser extent the tutor’s role in supporting/facilitating this work
  • The way in which technology is portrayed in films and books and how this might influence the way in which we perceive it in reality
    • Do we see truths in the films or do we question and disagree with them?
    • What are the implications of films portraying the negative/challenging sides of the relationship between humans and technology?
  • Why we chose to adopt particular technologies
    • What of our choice is linked to design?
    • How are we influenced by our peers?
    • How is Apple influencing the spectrum of early adopters? How do their design choices represent a consideration of the market?
  • The way in which our use of social media develops
    • Rise and fall of facebook
    • Does the use of social software ebb and flow – and if so what’s causing the tide to change? Is it all just linked to popularity and fashion or is there something more fundamentally linked to function?

Keywords: design, pscel09, questions, socialmedia

Posted by Emma King | 0 comment(s)

July 14, 2009

i hope this links up ok

Posted by Sian Bayne | 0 comment(s)

June 11, 2009

linking from hp

Keywords: linking testing storytlr

Posted by Sian Bayne | 0 comment(s)

December 19, 2007

My first blog post and it's for all to see!

Keywords: testing, welcome

Posted by Fiona Littleton | 0 comment(s)

this post is public! Laughing

Posted by Sian Bayne | 2 comment(s)

Next >>